Login
At least 18 popular JavaScript code packages that are collectively downloaded more than two billion times each week were briefly compromised with malicious software today, after a developer involved in maintaining the projects was phished. The attack appears to have been quickly contained and was narrowly focused on stealing cryptocurrency. But experts warn that a similar attack with a slightly more nefarious payload could lead to a disruptive malware outbreak that is far more difficult to detect and restrain.
This phishing email lured a developer into logging in at a fake NPM website and supplying a one-time token for two-factor authentication. The phishers then used that developer’s NPM account to add malicious code to at least 18 popular JavaScript code packages.
Aikido is a security firm in Belgium that monitors new code updates to major open-source code repositories, scanning any code updates for suspicious and malicious code. In a blog post published today, Aikido said its systems found malicious code had been added to at least 18 widely-used code libraries available on NPM (short for) “Node Package Manager,” which acts as a central hub for JavaScript development and the latest updates to widely-used JavaScript components.
JavaScript is a powerful web-based scripting language used by countless websites to build a more interactive experience with users, such as entering data into a form. But there’s no need for each website developer to build a program from scratch for entering data into a form when they can just reuse already existing packages of code at NPM that are specifically designed for that purpose.
Unfortunately, if cybercriminals manage to phish NPM credentials from developers, they can introduce malicious code that allows attackers to fundamentally control what people see in their web browser when they visit a website that uses one of the affected code libraries.
According to Aikido, the attackers injected a piece of code that silently intercepts cryptocurrency activity in the browser, “manipulates wallet interactions, and rewrites payment destinations so that funds and approvals are redirected to attacker-controlled accounts without any obvious signs to the user.”
“This malware is essentially a browser-based interceptor that hijacks both network traffic and application APIs,” Aikido researcher Charlie Eriksen wrote. “What makes it dangerous is that it operates at multiple layers: Altering content shown on websites, tampering with API calls, and manipulating what users’ apps believe they are signing. Even if the interface looks correct, the underlying transaction can be redirected in the background.”
Aikido said it used the social network Bsky to notify the affected developer, Josh Junon, who quickly replied that he was aware of having just been phished. The phishing email that Junon fell for was part of a larger campaign that spoofed NPM and told recipients they were required to update their two-factor authentication (2FA) credentials. The phishing site mimicked NPM’s login page, and intercepted Junon’s credentials and 2FA token. Once logged in, the phishers then changed the email address on file for Junon’s NPM account, temporarily locking him out.
Aikido notified the maintainer on Bluesky, who replied at 15:15 UTC that he was aware of being compromised, and starting to clean up the compromised packages.
Junon also issued a mea culpa on HackerNews, telling the community’s coder-heavy readership, “Hi, yep I got pwned.”
“It looks and feels a bit like a targeted attack,” Junon wrote. “Sorry everyone, very embarrassing.”
Philippe Caturegli, “chief hacking officer” at the security consultancy Seralys, observed that the attackers appear to have registered their spoofed website — npmjs[.]help — just two days before sending the phishing email. The spoofed website used services from dnsexit[.]com, a “dynamic DNS” company that also offers “100% free” domain names that can instantly be pointed at any IP address controlled by the user.
Junon’s mea cupla on Hackernews today listed the affected packages.
Caturegli said it’s remarkable that the attackers in this case were not more ambitious or malicious with their code modifications.
“The crazy part is they compromised billions of websites and apps just to target a couple of cryptocurrency things,” he said. “This was a supply chain attack, and it could easily have been something much worse than crypto harvesting.”
Akito’s Eriksen agreed, saying countless websites dodged a bullet because this incident was handled in a matter of hours. As an example of how these supply-chain attacks can escalate quickly, Eriksen pointed to another compromise of an NPM developer in late August that added malware to “nx,” an open-source code development toolkit with as many as six million weekly downloads.
In the nx compromise, the attackers introduced code that scoured the user’s device for authentication tokens from programmer destinations like GitHub and NPM, as well as SSH and API keys. But instead of sending those stolen credentials to a central server controlled by the attackers, the malicious code created a new public repository in the victim’s GitHub account, and published the stolen data there for all the world to see and download.
Eriksen said coding platforms like GitHub and NPM should be doing more to ensure that any new code commits for broadly-used packages require a higher level of attestation that confirms the code in question was in fact submitted by the person who owns the account, and not just by that person’s account.
“More popular packages should require attestation that it came through trusted provenance and not just randomly from some location on the Internet,” Eriksen said. “Where does the package get uploaded from, by GitHub in response to a new pull request into the main branch, or somewhere else? In this case, they didn’t compromise the target’s GitHub account. They didn’t touch that. They just uploaded a modified version that didn’t come where it’s expected to come from.”
Eriksen said code repository compromises can be devastating for developers, many of whom end up abandoning their projects entirely after such an incident.
“It’s unfortunate because one thing we’ve seen is people have their projects get compromised and they say, ‘You know what, I don’t have the energy for this and I’m just going to deprecate the whole package,'” Eriksen said.
Kevin Beaumont, a frequently quoted security expert who writes about security incidents at the blog doublepulsar.com, has been following this story closely today in frequent updates to his account on Mastodon. Beaumont said the incident is a reminder that much of the planet still depends on code that is ultimately maintained by an exceedingly small number of people who are mostly overburdened and under-resourced.
“For about the past 15 years every business has been developing apps by pulling in 178 interconnected libraries written by 24 people in a shed in Skegness,” Beaumont wrote on Mastodon. “For about the past 2 years orgs have been buying AI vibe coding tools, where some exec screams ‘make online shop’ into a computer and 389 libraries are added and an app is farted out. The output = if you want to own the world’s companies, just phish one guy in Skegness.”
Image: https://infosec.exchange/@GossiTheDog@cyberplace.social.
Aikido recently launched a product that aims to help development teams ensure that every code library used is checked for malware before it can be used or installed. Nicholas Weaver, a researcher with the International Computer Science Institute, a nonprofit in Berkeley, Calif., said Aikido’s new offering exists because many organizations are still one successful phishing attack away from a supply-chain nightmare.
Weaver said these types of supply-chain compromises will continue as long as people responsible for maintaining widely-used code continue to rely on phishable forms of 2FA.
“NPM should only support phish-proof authentication,” Weaver said, referring to physical security keys that are phish-proof — meaning that even if phishers manage to steal your username and password, they still can’t log in to your account without also possessing that physical key.
“All critical infrastructure needs to use phish-proof 2FA, and given the dependencies in modern software, archives such as NPM are absolutely critical infrastructure,” Weaver said. “That NPM does not require that all contributor accounts use security keys or similar 2FA methods should be considered negligence.”
Losing your phone or having it stolen can feel like a nightmare, especially when you consider the treasure trove of personal information stored on your device. From banking apps and email accounts to social media profiles and payment methods, smartphones contain virtually our entire digital lives. When a criminal or pickpocket gains access to your phone, they potentially have the keys to your identity, finances, and online presence. However, acting quickly and methodically can help minimize the risks and protect you from identity theft and financial fraud.
The reality is sobering, criminals with access to your phone can make unauthorized purchases, hack into your accounts, and even steal your identity to open new credit lines in your name. But by following these nine critical steps immediately after discovering your phone is missing, you can significantly reduce the potential damage and protect your most sensitive information.
Before taking any drastic measures, start with the obvious: try calling your phone from another device. You might hear it ring nearby, or someone who found it might answer and be willing to return it. If this doesn’t work, turn to your phone’s built-in tracking capabilities.
For iPhone users, Apple’s Find My service allows you to see your device’s location on a map, play a sound to help locate it, and even view its last known location if the battery has died. Android users can access Google’s Find My Device with similar functionality. Both services can be accessed from any computer or other device by logging into your Apple or Google account. These tracking tools not only help you locate your phone but also provide remote control options that become crucial if recovery seems unlikely.
If you can’t physically retrieve your phone or suspect it’s in the wrong hands, immediately lock it remotely. This creates an additional barrier between a potential thief and your personal information, preventing access to your apps, messages, emails, and saved payment methods.
Both iPhone and Android devices offer remote locking capabilities through their respective tracking services. You can also set a custom message to display on the lock screen with your contact information, which could help if someone honest finds your phone and wants to return it. For iPhone users, this means accessing iCloud.com or using the Find My app on another Apple device, selecting your lost phone, and choosing “Mark as Lost.” Android users can visit android.com/find, select their device, and choose “Secure Device” to lock it and display a custom message.
While law enforcement may not actively search for your stolen phone, filing a police report creates an official record that can prove invaluable if you need to dispute fraudulent charges or deal with insurance claims. When you visit your local police department, bring as much information as possible about when and where your phone was lost or stolen.
Having your phone’s IMEI number (International Mobile Equipment Identity) or serial number available will strengthen your report. You can usually find these numbers in your phone’s settings, on the original packaging, or through your carrier’s account portal. This documentation becomes particularly important if criminals use your phone to commit further crimes or if you need to prove to financial institutions that fraudulent activity resulted from theft.
Your next call should be to your mobile carrier to suspend service on your stolen or lost device. This prevents unauthorized calls, texts, or data usage that could result in unexpected charges on your bill. More importantly, it helps protect your account from being hijacked or used to access two-factor authentication codes sent to your number.
Most major carriers can also blacklist your stolen device, making it much harder for thieves to use even if they manage to bypass the screen lock. When you contact your carrier, ask about temporary suspension options if you’re still hoping to recover your phone, or proceed with permanent cancellation if you’re ready to move to a replacement device. Many carriers also offer insurance programs that may help cover the cost of a replacement phone.
Even with remote locking enabled, sophisticated criminals may find ways to access your stored information. This makes securing your online accounts one of the most critical steps in protecting yourself from identity theft. Your phone likely has saved passwords, active app sessions, and stored payment information that could be exploited.
Start by changing passwords for your most sensitive accounts, particularly email, banking, and financial services. Focus on creating strong, unique passwords that would be difficult for criminals to guess. McAfee’s Password Manager can secure your accounts by generating and storing complex passwords and auto-filling your info for faster logins across devices. Next, remotely sign out of all apps and services that were logged in on your stolen device. Most major platforms, including Google, Apple, Microsoft, and social media sites, offer account security settings where you can view active sessions and log out of all devices remotely. This step is crucial because it prevents thieves from accessing your accounts even if they bypass your phone’s lock screen.
Consider this an opportunity to enable two-factor authentication on accounts that support it, adding an extra layer of security for the future. While you’re at it, monitor your online and financial accounts closely for any suspicious activity, unauthorized transactions, or login attempts from unfamiliar locations.
Your stolen phone likely contains mobile payment apps like Apple Pay, Google Pay, or individual retailer apps with stored credit card information. Criminals can potentially use these payment methods to make unauthorized purchases, so removing them quickly is essential for protecting your finances.
For Apple Pay users, marking your device as lost through Find My iPhone will automatically suspend Apple Pay on that device. Alternatively, you can manually remove payment methods by signing into your Apple ID account at appleid.apple.com, selecting your lost device, and choosing to remove all cards. Google Pay users should visit payments.google.com, navigate to payment methods, and remove any cards linked to the compromised device.
Don’t stop there – contact your bank or credit card issuer directly to alert them about the potential for fraud. They can freeze or cancel the cards linked to your mobile payment apps and monitor for any suspicious transactions. Review your recent statements carefully and report any charges that weren’t made by you. Most financial institutions have straightforward fraud dispute processes and will work quickly to resolve unauthorized transactions.
When all hope of recovering your phone is lost, remote data erasure becomes your final line of defense against identity theft. This nuclear option wipes all stored data, settings, media, and personal information from your device, ensuring that criminals can’t access your photos, contacts, passwords, financial information, or any other sensitive data.
Both iPhone and Android devices offer comprehensive remote wipe capabilities through their respective tracking services. For iPhone users, this means accessing Find My and selecting “Erase iPhone,” which will restore the device to factory settings and remove all personal information. Android users can accomplish the same thing through Find My Device by selecting “Erase Device.”
Keep in mind that once you erase your phone remotely, you’ll lose the ability to track it further, so make sure you’ve exhausted all other options first. However, the peace of mind that comes from knowing your personal information can’t be accessed often outweighs the slim chance of recovery.
Criminals with access to your phone may attempt to exploit your personal relationships by impersonating you in messages or calls to your contacts. They might send urgent requests for money, ask for sensitive information, or attempt to trick your friends and family into various scams using your trusted identity.
Reach out to your closest contacts through alternative communication methods to warn them that your phone has been compromised. Let them know to be suspicious of any unusual requests coming from your number and to verify your identity through a different channel if they receive anything questionable. This proactive step can prevent your loved ones from becoming secondary victims of the crime.
Once you’ve accepted that your phone is truly gone, it’s time to focus on getting back online securely. Check with your mobile carrier about replacement options, as some plans include insurance coverage that can significantly reduce the cost of a new device. Even if you don’t have insurance, carriers often offer payment plans for replacement phones.
When you get your new device, you’ll be able to restore your data from cloud backups like iCloud or Google Drive. This is why maintaining regular automatic backups is so important – they ensure you don’t lose photos, contacts, app data, and other important information permanently. During the setup process, take the opportunity to review and strengthen your security settings based on what you’ve learned from this experience.
The theft of your phone represents just one potential pathway to identity theft, but it’s often one of the most impactful because of how much personal information our devices contain. While following the steps above can help minimize immediate damage, comprehensive protection requires ongoing vigilance and professional monitoring services.
McAfee’s Identity Protection offers multiple layers of defense that can alert you to potential identity theft before it becomes a major problem. Through comprehensive identity monitoring, McAfee identifies your personal information across the dark web and various databases, providing early warnings when your data appears in places it shouldn’t. This includes monitoring of social security numbers, government IDs, credit card numbers, bank account details, email addresses, and phone numbers – often alerting users up to 10 months earlier than similar services.
The credit monitoring component keeps watch over changes to your credit score, reports, and accounts, sending timely notifications when new accounts are opened, credit inquiries are made, or suspicious activity is detected. This early warning system can help you catch identity thieves before they cause significant financial damage. Perhaps most importantly, if you do become a victim of identity theft in the U.S., McAfee provides up to $2 million in identity theft coverage and restoration support for select McAfee+ plans.
While no one plans to have their phone stolen, taking preventive measures can significantly reduce the potential impact if it happens to you. Enable device tracking features like Find My or Find My Device before you need them, and make sure you know how to access these services from other devices. Use a strong passcode or biometric authentication that would be difficult for thieves to guess or bypass quickly.
Consider adding a PIN to your SIM card to prevent thieves from removing it and using it in another device. Maintain regular automatic backups to cloud services so you won’t lose important data permanently if your phone disappears. Most importantly, review and limit the amount of sensitive information you store directly on your device and consider using additional authentication methods for your most critical accounts.
Record your phone’s IMEI number and serial number in a safe place where you can access them if needed for police reports or insurance claims. These small preparatory steps can save significant time and stress if the worst happens.
Phone theft is just one of many ways criminals can gain access to your personal information and identity. In our interconnected digital world, comprehensive protection requires a multi-layered approach that goes beyond device security. Data breaches at major companies, phishing attacks, social engineering scams, and various online threats all pose risks to your identity and financial well-being.
This is where integrated protection services like McAfee+ become invaluable. Rather than trying to manage multiple security concerns separately, comprehensive identity and device protection provides peace of mind through continuous monitoring, early warning systems, and professional restoration support when things go wrong. The goal isn’t just to react to problems after they occur, but to prevent them from happening in the first place and to minimize their impact when prevention isn’t enough.
Having your phone stolen is stressful enough without worrying about the long-term consequences for your identity and finances. By following these nine essential steps quickly and methodically, you can significantly reduce the potential damage and protect yourself from becoming a victim of identity theft. Remember, the key is acting fast – every minute counts when it comes to protecting your digital life from criminals who might have gained access to your most personal information.
The post What to Do if Your Phone is Stolen or Lost: 10 Steps to Protect Your Identity appeared first on McAfee Blog.
As another school year begins, the digital landscape our children navigate has become increasingly complex. With artificial intelligence tools now readily available and social media platforms evolving rapidly, considering creating a family technology pledge has never been more crucial, or more challenging.
Gone are the days when we simply worried about screen time limits. Today’s parents must address everything from AI-assisted homework to the growing threat of deepfake cyberbullying. The technology shaping our kids’ lives isn’t just about phones and social media anymore—it’s about preparing them for a world where artificial intelligence is reshaping how they learn, communicate, and express themselves.
Recent research from the Pew Research Center shows that 26% of students aged 13-17 are using ChatGPT to help with their assignments, double the number from 2023. Meanwhile, surveys reveal that between 40 and 50 percent of students are aware of deepfakes being circulated at school. These statistics underscore a reality many parents aren’t prepared for: our children are already immersed in an AI-powered world, whether we’ve given them permission or not.
The key to successful digital parenting in 2025 isn’t necessarily about banning technology—it’s about having intentional, educational conversations that prepare our children to use these powerful tools responsibly. We need to acknowledge that technology is here to stay, so the best thing we can do is accept it’s here, educate our kids on how to use it safely, and introduce boundaries and rules to help keep them protected.
For any pledge to be effective, lasting, and conflict-free, we need to shift the focus from simply setting rules to creating an open, constructive dialogue that helps all family members use technology in healthy ways. The most successful technology pledges are created collaboratively, not decided without collaboration. This ensures everyone feels included and that the guidelines reflect your family’s unique needs and values.
The most important consideration in tailoring a pledge to your kids’ ages and maturity levels, and to your family’s schedule. There’s no point making pledges that don’t reflect your children’s actual technology use or your family’s realistic expectations. Remember, this is about starting conversations and creating a framework for ongoing dialogue, not a rigid set of rules that’s destined to fail.
One of the biggest changes in recent years is the need to address AI tools like ChatGPT, Claude, and other learning platforms. Rather than trying to catch assignments written by AI, many schools are now launching programs that include AI Learning Modes, recognizing that these tools can be valuable when used appropriately.
The benefits of AI assistance in education are significant and shouldn’t be ignored. AI can serve as a personalized tutor, explaining complex concepts in multiple ways until a student understands. It can help students with learning differences access the curriculum more effectively, and students working in a second language can use these tools to level the playing field. When used properly, AI can enhance critical thinking by helping students explore different perspectives on topics and organizing their thoughts more clearly.
However, the risks of over-reliance on AI are equally real and concerning. New research has shown that overreliance on AI might erode our ability to think critically, and critical thinking skills are essential for success in the real world. Students may become dependent on AI for basic problem-solving, missing opportunities to develop their own analytical skills and unique voice. Academic integrity concerns arise when AI does the work instead of supporting learning, potentially undermining the entire educational process.
Your family technology pledge should address these nuances.. Children should understand that they will use AI tools to enhance their learning, not replace it. This means always disclosing when they’ve used AI assistance on assignments, using AI to explain concepts they don’t understand while still working through problems themselves, and never submitting AI-generated work as their own original thinking. They should learn to ask AI to help with organizing thoughts, not creating them, and use AI to check their work for errors while ensuring the ideas and solutions remain their own.
The rise of AI-generated content has created unprecedented risks for students, particularly regarding deepfake technology. Research shows that girls are most often targeted by deepfake images, and for victims, the emotional and psychological impact can be severe and long-lasting. What’s particularly alarming is that one photo posted online is all that’s needed to create a deepfake, making this a potential risk for every student.
Parents should help their children become mindful of what photos they share on social media, understanding that any image could potentially be misused. Children must understand that they should never participate in group chats or conversations where deepfakes are being shared, even passively. They need to recognize that creating deepfakes of others, even as a “joke,” can cause serious psychological harm and that possession of manipulated sexual imagery involving minors is illegal.
Creating a family technology pledge isn’t about limiting your child’s potential—it’s about empowering them to navigate an increasingly complex digital world safely and ethically. The emergence of AI tools and deepfakes is forcing families to have important conversations about ethics, empathy, and responsibility that previous generations never had to consider.
The goal isn’t to create a perfect document that anticipates every possible scenario. Instead, it’s to establish a foundation for ongoing dialogue about how technology can enhance rather than detract from your family’s values and your child’s growth into a thoughtful, responsible digital citizen. To help parents and guardians start discussions, we’ve created a first draft Technology Pledge that you can use to start a discussion with your family. Click here to download McAfee’s Technology Pledge
The digital landscape will continue to evolve, but the fundamental principles of kindness, honesty, and critical thinking remain constant. By creating a thoughtful technology pledge and maintaining open dialogue about digital challenges, you’re giving your child the tools they need to thrive in whatever technological environment they encounter. Start the conversation today. Your child’s digital future depends on it.
The post How to Create a Family Technology Pledge appeared first on McAfee Blog.
The chairman of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) last week sent a letter to Google’s CEO demanding to know why Gmail was blocking messages from Republican senders while allegedly failing to block similar missives supporting Democrats. The letter followed media reports accusing Gmail of disproportionately flagging messages from the GOP fundraising platform WinRed and sending them to the spam folder. But according to experts who track daily spam volumes worldwide, WinRed’s messages are getting blocked more because its methods of blasting email are increasingly way more spammy than that of ActBlue, the fundraising platform for Democrats.
Image: nypost.com
On Aug. 13, The New York Post ran an “exclusive” story titled, “Google caught flagging GOP fundraiser emails as ‘suspicious’ — sending them directly to spam.” The story cited a memo from Targeted Victory – whose clients include the National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC), Rep. Steve Scalise and Sen. Marsha Blackburn – which said it observed that the “serious and troubling” trend was still going on as recently as June and July of this year.
“If Gmail is allowed to quietly suppress WinRed links while giving ActBlue a free pass, it will continue to tilt the playing field in ways that voters never see, but campaigns will feel every single day,” the memo reportedly said.
In an August 28 letter to Google CEO Sundar Pichai, FTC Chairman Andrew Ferguson cited the New York Post story and warned that Gmail’s parent Alphabet may be engaging in unfair or deceptive practices.
“Alphabet’s alleged partisan treatment of comparable messages or messengers in Gmail to achieve political objectives may violate both of these prohibitions under the FTC Act,” Ferguson wrote. “And the partisan treatment may cause harm to consumers.”
However, the situation looks very different when you ask spam experts what’s going on with WinRed’s recent messaging campaigns. Atro Tossavainen and Pekka Jalonen are co-founders at Koli-Lõks OÜ, an email intelligence company in Estonia. Koli-Lõks taps into real-time intelligence about daily spam volumes by monitoring large numbers of “spamtraps” — email addresses that are intentionally set up to catch unsolicited emails.
Spamtraps are generally not used for communication or account creation, but instead are created to identify senders exhibiting spammy behavior, such as scraping the Internet for email addresses or buying unmanaged distribution lists. As an email sender, blasting these spamtraps over and over with unsolicited email is the fastest way to ruin your domain’s reputation online. Such activity also virtually ensures that more of your messages are going to start getting listed on spam blocklists that are broadly shared within the global anti-abuse community.
Tossavainen told KrebsOnSecurity that WinRed’s emails hit its spamtraps in the .com, .net, and .org space far more frequently than do fundraising emails sent by ActBlue. Koli-Lõks published a graph of the stark disparity in spamtrap activity for WinRed versus ActBlue, showing a nearly fourfold increase in spamtrap hits from WinRed emails in the final week of July 2025.
Image: Koliloks.eu
“Many of our spamtraps are in repurposed legacy-TLD domains (.com, .org, .net) and therefore could be understood to have been involved with a U.S. entity in their pre-zombie life,” Tossavainen explained in the LinkedIn post.
Raymond Dijkxhoorn is the CEO and a founding member of SURBL, a widely-used blocklist that flags domains and IP addresses known to be used in unsolicited messages, phishing and malware distribution. Dijkxhoorn said their spamtrap data mirrors that of Koli-Lõks, and shows that WinRed has consistently been far more aggressive in sending email than ActBlue.
Dijkxhoorn said the fact that WinRed’s emails so often end up dinging the organization’s sender reputation is not a content issue but rather a technical one.
“On our end we don’t really care if the content is political or trying to sell viagra or penis enlargements,” Dijkxhoorn said. “It’s the mechanics, they should not end up in spamtraps. And that’s the reason the domain reputation is tempered. Not ‘because domain reputation firms have a political agenda.’ We really don’t care about the political situation anywhere. The same as we don’t mind people buying penis enlargements. But when either of those land in spamtraps it will impact sending experience.”
The FTC letter to Google’s CEO also referenced a debunked 2022 study (PDF) by political consultants who found Google caught more Republican emails in spam filters. Techdirt editor Mike Masnick notes that while the 2022 study also found that other email providers caught more Democratic emails as spam, “Republicans laser-focused on Gmail because it fit their victimization narrative better.”
Masnick said GOP lawmakers then filed both lawsuits and complaints with the Federal Election Commission (both of which failed easily), claiming this was somehow an “in-kind contribution” to Democrats.
“This is political posturing designed to keep the White House happy by appearing to ‘do something’ about conservative claims of ‘censorship,'” Masnick wrote of the FTC letter. “The FTC has never policed ‘political bias’ in private companies’ editorial decisions, and for good reason—the First Amendment prohibits exactly this kind of government interference.”
WinRed did not respond to a request for comment.
The WinRed website says it is an online fundraising platform supported by a united front of the Trump campaign, the Republican National Committee (RNC), the NRSC, and the National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC).
WinRed has recently come under fire for aggressive fundraising via text message as well. In June, 404 Media reported on a lawsuit filed by a family in Utah against the RNC for allegedly bombarding their mobile phones with text messages seeking donations after they’d tried to unsubscribe from the missives dozens of times.
One of the family members said they received 27 such messages from 25 numbers, even after sending 20 stop requests. The plaintiffs in that case allege the texts from WinRed and the RNC “knowingly disregard stop requests and purposefully use different phone numbers to make it impossible to block new messages.”
Dijkxhoorn said WinRed did inquire recently about why some of its assets had been marked as a risk by SURBL, but he said they appeared to have zero interest in investigating the likely causes he offered in reply.
“They only replied with, ‘You are interfering with U.S. elections,'” Dijkxhoorn said, noting that many of SURBL’s spamtrap domains are only publicly listed in the registration records for random domain names.
“They’re at best harvested by themselves but more likely [they] just went and bought lists,” he said. “It’s not like ‘Oh Google is filtering this and not the other,’ the reason isn’t the provider. The reason is the fundraising spammers and the lists they send to.”
Article tags
October marks Cybersecurity Awareness Month, and this year’s message couldn’t be clearer: small actions can make a big difference in your online safety. As cyber threats continue to evolve and become more sophisticated, the importance of taking proactive steps to protect yourself, your family, and your personal information has never been greater.
The 2025 theme, “Secure Our World,” focuses on simple yet powerful steps that anyone can implement to boost their digital security. At the heart of this year’s campaign are the “Core 4” essential practices that form the foundation of good cybersecurity habits. These four pillars represent the most impactful actions you can take to strengthen your digital defenses without requiring technical expertise or significant time investment.
The Core 4 principles serve as your digital security roadmap. Using strong passwords paired with a reliable password manager eliminates one of the most common vulnerabilities that cybercriminals exploit. When every account has a unique, complex password, a breach of one service doesn’t compromise your entire digital life.
Enabling multifactor authentication adds a crucial second layer of protection that makes unauthorized access exponentially more difficult. Even if someone obtains your password, they would still need access to your phone or authentication app to breach your accounts. This simple step blocks the vast majority of automated attacks and significantly raises the bar for would-be intruders.
Keeping your software updated ensures that known security vulnerabilities are patched as soon as fixes become available. Cybercriminals often target outdated software because they know exactly which weaknesses to exploit. By maintaining current versions of your operating system, apps, and security software, you close these doors before attackers can walk through them.
The fourth pillar, recognizing and reporting scams, has become increasingly critical as fraudulent schemes grow more sophisticated and prevalent. Today’s scammers leverage artificial intelligence to create convincing fake emails, text messages, and even video content that can fool even cautious consumers.
The statistics paint a sobering picture of today’s threat landscape. According to McAfee’s comprehensive Scamiverse Report, 59% of people globally say they or someone they know has been a victim of an online scam, with Americans facing an average of 14+ scams per day. Between February and March 2025 alone, scam text volumes nearly quadrupled, with almost half using cloaked links to disguise malicious intent.
The burden on consumers is staggering. Americans spend an average of 93.6 hours per year – nearly two and a half work weeks, just reviewing messages to identify fakes. This represents 1.6 hours per week spent verifying whether communications are legitimate, a significant drain on time that could be spent on productive activities. The emotional toll is equally concerning, with 35% of people globally experiencing moderate to significant distress from scams, and two-thirds of people reporting they are more worried about scams than ever before.
What makes modern scams particularly dangerous is their increasing sophistication and alarming success rates. When scams do succeed, 87% of victims lose money, with financial losses often being substantial. According to the Scamiverse Report, 33% of scam victims lost over $500, while 21% lost more than $1,000, and 8% lost over $5,000. Most troubling is the speed at which these crimes unfold – 64% of successful scams result in money or information theft in less than one hour.
Young adults face particularly high risks, with 77% of people aged 18-24 having been scam victims – significantly higher than the global average. This demographic encounters an average of 3.5 deepfake videos daily, compared to 1.2 daily for Americans over 65. The pattern suggests that digital nativity doesn’t necessarily translate to better scam detection abilities.
Today’s cybercriminals have embraced artificial intelligence as a force multiplier for their fraudulent activities. The accessibility of deepfake creation tools has democratized sophisticated fraud techniques that were once available only to well-funded criminal organizations. For just $5 and in 10 minutes, scammers can create realistic deepfake videos using any of the 17 different AI tools tested by McAfee Labs.
The scale of this threat has exploded exponentially. North America has seen a staggering 1,740% increase in deepfakes over the past year, with over 500,000 deepfakes shared on social media in 2023 alone. Americans now encounter an average of 3 deepfake videos per day, yet confidence in detection abilities remains concerning – while 56% of Americans believe they can spot deepfake scams, 44% admit they lack confidence in their ability to identify manipulated content.
The platform distribution reveals where consumers are most at risk. Among Americans, 68% report encountering deepfakes on Facebook, followed by 30% on Instagram, 28% on TikTok, and 17% on X (formerly Twitter). Older adults appear particularly vulnerable on Facebook, with 81% of those 65+ encountering deepfakes on the platform.
Understanding these evolving threats requires more than awareness—it demands tools that can keep pace with rapidly changing criminal tactics. Traditional approaches that rely solely on user education and manual verification are no longer sufficient when facing AI-generated content that can fool even security-conscious individuals. The challenge becomes even greater when considering that repeat victimization is common, with 26% of scam victims falling victim to another scam within 12 months.
People are developing some detection strategies, but these manual methods have limitations. According to the Scamiverse Report, 40% of people look for over-the-top claims like unrealistic discounts, while 35% watch for distorted imagery or suspicious website links. Other detection methods include identifying images that seem too perfect (33%), generic audio (28%), and audio-lip sync mismatches (28%). However, only 17% use more advanced techniques like reverse image searches to verify content authenticity.
The same artificial intelligence that enables sophisticated scams can also serve as our defense against them. Advanced security solutions now use machine learning algorithms to analyze patterns, context, and content in real-time, identifying threats that would be impossible for humans to detect quickly enough. This technological arms race requires consumers to leverage AI-powered protection to match the sophistication of modern threats.
McAfee’s Scam Detector represents a significant advancement in consumer protection, using AI-powered detection to identify and alert consumers of scam texts, emails, and AI-generated audio in deepfake videos across multiple platforms and devices. This technology addresses the reality that manual detection methods, while useful, aren’t sufficient against the volume and sophistication of current threats. When people are spending nearly 94 hours per year just trying to identify fake messages, automated protection becomes essential for reclaiming both time and peace of mind. With scam detector, you can automatically know what’s real and what’s fake.
McAfee’s Scam Detector works across three critical communication channels: text messages, emails, and video content. For text message protection, the system monitors incoming SMS communications and alerts users to potentially dangerous content before they open suspicious messages. This proactive approach prevents the curiosity factor that often leads people to engage with scam content—total protection with no guesswork.
Email protection extends to major providers, including Gmail, Microsoft, Yahoo Mail, and more, with lightning-fast background scanning that identifies suspicious messages and provides clear explanations of the risks involved. This educational component helps users understand the specific tactics scammers employ, from urgency language to impersonation strategies.
The scam detection capability represents a unique advancement in consumer protection, using AI to detect deepfake audio and other manipulative media designed to impersonate trusted individuals or spread disinformation. This feature addresses the growing threat of fake celebrity endorsements, manipulated political content, and fraudulent investment pitches that leverage realistic-sounding audio content and is trained to identify AI-generated audio.
In February 2025, McAfee Labs found that 59% of deepfake detections came from YouTube, more than all other domains combined, reinforcing the platform’s role as a primary source of deepfake content. This data underscores the importance of having protection that works across the platforms where people naturally consume video content.
Effective cybersecurity extends beyond scam detection to encompass all aspects of digital life. Password management remains fundamental, as weak or reused passwords continue to be primary attack vectors. A quality password manager not only generates strong, unique passwords for every account but also alerts users when their credentials appear in data breaches.
Virtual private networks (VPNs) such as Secure VPN provide essential protection when using public Wi-Fi networks, encrypting internet traffic to prevent eavesdropping and man-in-the-middle attacks. This protection is particularly important for remote workers and travelers who frequently connect to untrusted networks.
Identity monitoring services watch for signs that personal information has been compromised or is being misused. McAfee’s Identity Monitoring services scan for data breach databases, monitor credit reports, and alert users to suspicious activity across various financial and personal accounts. Select plans of McAfee+, can provide up to $2M of identity theft coverage. Early detection of identity theft can significantly reduce the time and effort required for recovery. Our identity monitoring service can notify you up to 10 months sooner than similar services.
Device protection through comprehensive antivirus and anti-malware solutions remains crucial as cyber threats continue to target endpoints. Modern security suites use behavioral analysis and machine learning to identify previously unknown threats while maintaining system performance.
While technology provides powerful tools for protection, human judgment remains irreplaceable in maintaining security. Understanding common social engineering tactics helps consumers recognize when they’re being manipulated, even when automated systems might not detect a threat immediately.
Scammers frequently exploit emotions like fear, urgency, and greed to bypass rational decision-making. Messages claiming immediate action is required to avoid account closure, unexpected windfalls that require upfront payments, or urgent requests from family members in distress all follow predictable patterns that become easier to recognize with awareness and practice.
Verification through independent channels remains one of the most effective defense strategies. When receiving unexpected requests for money or personal information, contacting the supposed sender through a known, trusted method can quickly expose fraudulent communications.
Cybersecurity is most effective when it becomes a shared responsibility within families and communities. Parents can model good digital hygiene practices for their children while teaching age-appropriate lessons about online safety. Regular family discussions about recent scam trends and security practices help create an environment where everyone feels comfortable reporting suspicious activity.
Workplace security awareness programs extend protection beyond individual households to encompass professional environments where data breaches can have far-reaching consequences. Employees who understand their role in organizational security are more likely to follow proper protocols and report potential threats promptly.
Community education initiatives, often supported by local law enforcement and cybersecurity organizations, provide valuable resources for groups that might be particularly vulnerable to certain types of fraud, such as seniors targeted by tech support scams or small business owners facing ransomware threats.
The cybersecurity landscape will continue evolving as both threats and defenses become more sophisticated. Artificial intelligence will play an increasingly central role on both sides of this digital arms race, making advanced protection tools essential for ordinary consumers who lack specialized technical knowledge.
Integration between different security tools will likely improve, creating more seamless protection that works across all devices and platforms without requiring separate management interfaces. This consolidation will make comprehensive security more accessible to consumers who currently find managing multiple security solutions overwhelming.
Regulatory initiatives may also shape the future of consumer protection, potentially requiring stronger default security measures on devices and platforms while establishing clearer responsibilities for organizations that handle personal data.
Cybersecurity Awareness Month provides an excellent opportunity to evaluate and improve your digital protection strategy. Start by implementing the Core 4 practices: use strong passwords with a password manager, enable multifactor authentication on all important accounts, keep your software updated, and learn to recognize and report scams.
Consider comprehensive protection solutions that address multiple threat vectors simultaneously rather than relying on piecemeal approaches. Look for services that combine device protection, identity monitoring, scam detection, and privacy tools in integrated packages that work together seamlessly.
Remember that cybersecurity is an ongoing process rather than a one-time setup. Threats evolve constantly, requiring regular updates to both your tools and your knowledge. Stay informed about emerging threats through reliable sources and adjust your protection strategies accordingly. McAfee delivers smarter protection against evolving threats.
The digital world offers tremendous benefits for communication, commerce, education, and entertainment. By taking proactive steps to protect yourself and your family, you can enjoy these advantages while minimizing the risks that come with our increasingly connected lives. Small actions today can prevent significant problems tomorrow, making cybersecurity one of the most valuable investments you can make in your digital future.
The post Secure Your World This Cybersecurity Awareness Month appeared first on McAfee Blog.
The recent mass-theft of authentication tokens from Salesloft, whose AI chatbot is used by a broad swath of corporate America to convert customer interaction into Salesforce leads, has left many companies racing to invalidate the stolen credentials before hackers can exploit them. Now Google warns the breach goes far beyond access to Salesforce data, noting the hackers responsible also stole valid authentication tokens for hundreds of online services that customers can integrate with Salesloft, including Slack, Google Workspace, Amazon S3, Microsoft Azure, and OpenAI.
Salesloft says its products are trusted by 5,000+ customers. Some of the bigger names are visible on the company’s homepage.
Salesloft disclosed on August 20 that, “Today, we detected a security issue in the Drift application,” referring to the technology that powers an AI chatbot used by so many corporate websites. The alert urged customers to re-authenticate the connection between the Drift and Salesforce apps to invalidate their existing authentication tokens, but it said nothing then to indicate those tokens had already been stolen.
On August 26, the Google Threat Intelligence Group (GTIG) warned that unidentified hackers tracked as UNC6395 used the access tokens stolen from Salesloft to siphon large amounts of data from numerous corporate Salesforce instances. Google said the data theft began as early as Aug. 8, 2025 and lasted through at least Aug. 18, 2025, and that the incident did not involve any vulnerability in the Salesforce platform.
Google said the attackers have been sifting through the massive data haul for credential materials such as AWS keys, VPN credentials, and credentials to the cloud storage provider Snowflake.
“If successful, the right credentials could allow them to further compromise victim and client environments, as well as pivot to the victim’s clients or partner environments,” the GTIG report stated.
The GTIG updated its advisory on August 28 to acknowledge the attackers used the stolen tokens to access email from “a very small number of Google Workspace accounts” that were specially configured to integrate with Salesloft. More importantly, it warned organizations to immediately invalidate all tokens stored in or connected to their Salesloft integrations — regardless of the third-party service in question.
“Given GTIG’s observations of data exfiltration associated with the campaign, organizations using Salesloft Drift to integrate with third-party platforms (including but not limited to Salesforce) should consider their data compromised and are urged to take immediate remediation steps,” Google advised.
On August 28, Salesforce blocked Drift from integrating with its platform, and with its productivity platforms Slack and Pardot.
The Salesloft incident comes on the heels of a broad social engineering campaign that used voice phishing to trick targets into connecting a malicious app to their organization’s Salesforce portal. That campaign led to data breaches and extortion attacks affecting a number of companies including Adidas, Allianz Life and Qantas.
On August 5, Google disclosed that one of its corporate Salesforce instances was compromised by the attackers, which the GTIG has dubbed UNC6040 (“UNC” stands for “uncategorized threat group”). Google said the extortionists consistently claimed to be the threat group ShinyHunters, and that the group appeared to be preparing to escalate its extortion attacks by launching a data leak site.
ShinyHunters is an amorphous threat group known for using social engineering to break into cloud platforms and third-party IT providers, and for posting dozens of stolen databases to cybercrime communities like the now-defunct Breachforums.
The ShinyHunters brand dates back to 2020, and the group has been credited with or taken responsibility for dozens of data leaks that exposed hundreds of millions of breached records. The group’s member roster is thought to be somewhat fluid, drawing mainly from active denizens of the Com, a mostly English-language cybercrime community scattered across an ocean of Telegram and Discord servers.
Recorded Future’s Alan Liska told Bleeping Computer that the overlap in the “tools, techniques and procedures” used by ShinyHunters and the Scattered Spider extortion group likely indicate some crossover between the two groups.
To muddy the waters even further, on August 28 a Telegram channel that now has nearly 40,000 subscribers was launched under the intentionally confusing banner “Scattered LAPSUS$ Hunters 4.0,” wherein participants have repeatedly claimed responsibility for the Salesloft hack without actually sharing any details to prove their claims.
The Telegram group has been trying to attract media attention by threatening security researchers at Google and other firms. It also is using the channel’s sudden popularity to promote a new cybercrime forum called “Breachstars,” which they claim will soon host data stolen from victim companies who refuse to negotiate a ransom payment.
The “Scattered Lapsus$ Hunters 4.0” channel on Telegram now has roughly 40,000 subscribers.
But Austin Larsen, a principal threat analyst at Google’s threat intelligence group, said there is no compelling evidence to attribute the Salesloft activity to ShinyHunters or to other known groups at this time.
“Their understanding of the incident seems to come from public reporting alone,” Larsen told KrebsOnSecurity, referring to the most active participants in the Scattered LAPSUS$ Hunters 4.0 Telegram channel.
Joshua Wright, a senior technical director at Counter Hack, is credited with coining the term “authorization sprawl” to describe one key reason that social engineering attacks from groups like Scattered Spider and ShinyHunters so often succeed: They abuse legitimate user access tokens to move seamlessly between on-premises and cloud systems.
Wright said this type of attack chain often goes undetected because the attacker sticks to the resources and access already allocated to the user.
“Instead of the conventional chain of initial access, privilege escalation and endpoint bypass, these threat actors are using centralized identity platforms that offer single sign-on (SSO) and integrated authentication and authorization schemes,” Wright wrote in a June 2025 column. “Rather than creating custom malware, attackers use the resources already available to them as authorized users.”
It remains unclear exactly how the attackers gained access to all Salesloft Drift authentication tokens. Salesloft announced on August 27 that it hired Mandiant, Google Cloud’s incident response division, to investigate the root cause(s).
“We are working with Salesloft Drift to investigate the root cause of what occurred and then it’ll be up to them to publish that,” Mandiant Consulting CTO Charles Carmakal told Cyberscoop. “There will be a lot more tomorrow, and the next day, and the next day.”
Last month, KrebsOnSecurity tracked the sudden emergence of hundreds of polished online gaming and wagering websites that lure people with free credits and eventually abscond with any cryptocurrency funds deposited by players. We’ve since learned that these scam gambling sites have proliferated thanks to a new Russian affiliate program called “Gambler Panel” that bills itself as a “soulless project that is made for profit.”
A machine-translated version of Gambler Panel’s affiliate website.
The scam begins with deceptive ads posted on social media that claim the wagering sites are working in partnership with popular athletes or social media personalities. The ads invariably state that by using a supplied “promo code,” interested players can claim a $2,500 credit on the advertised gaming website.
The gaming sites ask visitors to create a free account to claim their $2,500 credit, which they can use to play any number of extremely polished video games that ask users to bet on each action. However, when users try to cash out any “winnings” the gaming site will reject the request and prompt the user to make a “verification deposit” of cryptocurrency — typically around $100 — before any money can be distributed.
Those who deposit cryptocurrency funds are soon pressed into more wagering and making additional deposits. And — shocker alert — all players eventually lose everything they’ve invested in the platform.
The number of scam gambling or “scambling” sites has skyrocketed in the past month, and now we know why: The sites all pull their gaming content and detailed strategies for fleecing players straight from the playbook created by Gambler Panel, a Russian-language affiliate program that promises affiliates up to 70 percent of the profits.
Gambler Panel’s website gambler-panel[.]com links to a helpful wiki that explains the scam from cradle to grave, offering affiliates advice on how best to entice visitors, keep them gambling, and extract maximum profits from each victim.
“We have a completely self-written from scratch FAKE CASINO engine that has no competitors,” Gambler Panel’s wiki enthuses. “Carefully thought-out casino design in every pixel, a lot of audits, surveys of real people and test traffic floods were conducted, which allowed us to create something that has no doubts about the legitimacy and trustworthiness even for an inveterate gambling addict with many years of experience.”
Gambler Panel explains that the one and only goal of affiliates is to drive traffic to these scambling sites by any and all means possible.
A machine-translated portion of Gambler Panel’s singular instruction for affiliates: Drive traffic to these scambling sites by any means available.
“Unlike white gambling affiliates, we accept absolutely any type of traffic, regardless of origin, the only limitation is the CIS countries,” the wiki continued, referring to a common prohibition against scamming people in Russia and former Soviet republics in the Commonwealth of Independent States.
The program’s website claims it has more than 20,000 affiliates, who earn a minimum of $10 for each verification deposit. Interested new affiliates must first get approval from the group’s Telegram channel, which currently has around 2,500 active users.
The Gambler Panel channel is replete with images of affiliate panels showing the daily revenue of top affiliates, scantily-clad young women promoting the Gambler logo, and fast cars that top affiliates claimed they bought with their earnings.
A machine-translated version of the wiki for the affiliate program Gambler Panel.
The apparent popularity of this scambling niche is a consequence of the program’s ease of use and detailed instructions for successfully reproducing virtually every facet of the scam. Indeed, much of the tutorial focuses on advice and ready-made templates to help even novice affiliates drive traffic via social media websites, particularly on Instagram and TikTok.
Gambler Panel also walks affiliates through a range of possible responses to questions from users who are trying to withdraw funds from the platform. This section, titled “Rules for working in Live chat,” urges scammers to respond quickly to user requests (1-7 minutes), and includes numerous strategies for keeping the conversation professional and the user on the platform as long as possible.
A machine-translated version of the Gambler Panel’s instructions on managing chat support conversations with users.
The connection between Gambler Panel and the explosion in the number of scambling websites was made by a 17-year-old developer who operates multiple Discord servers that have been flooded lately with misleading ads for these sites.
The researcher, who asked to be identified only by the nickname “Thereallo,” said Gambler Panel has built a scalable business product for other criminals.
“The wiki is kinda like a ‘how to scam 101’ for criminals written with the clarity you would expect from a legitimate company,” Thereallo said. “It’s clean, has step by step guides, and treats their scam platform like a real product. You could swap out the content, and it could be any documentation for startups.”
“They’ve minimized their own risk — spreading the links on Discord / Facebook / YT Shorts, etc. — and outsourced it to a hungry affiliate network, just like a franchise,” Thereallo wrote in response to questions.
“A centralized platform that can serve over 1,200 domains with a shared user base, IP tracking, and a custom API is not at all a trivial thing to build,” Thereallo said. “It’s a scalable system designed to be a resilient foundation for thousands of disposable scam sites.”
The security firm Silent Push has compiled a list of the latest domains associated with the Gambler Panel, available here (.csv).
Beth Hyland never imagined love would cost her $26,000. At 53, she considered herself cautious and financially aware. But when she matched with someone calling himself “Richard Dobb”, the whirlwind connection, late-night conversations, and promises of a future together felt genuine. What she didn’t realize was that she was being drawn into one of the most devastating and personal scams out there—romance fraud.
Beth and Richard’s connection quickly escalated. They weren’t “officially” engaged, but in her mind, they were planning a future together. Richard told her he had just completed a project in Qatar and needed to pay a translator to finalize things. The catch? He claimed he couldn’t access his funds unless he went in person to a bank branch in England.
That’s when the requests for money began.
Richard framed it as a temporary problem. If Beth could just help him raise the money, they’d be set. Wanting to support her partner, she took out a $15,000 loan and added another $5,000 in cash advances from her credit card.
When she asked how to send the money, he directed her to a cryptocurrency site.
Beth’s financial advisor became concerned. “I think you’re in a romance scam,” he told her. But Beth didn’t want to believe it.
“No,” she thought, “we’re in love. He wouldn’t do this to me.”
Her last message to Richard was desperate: “If you’re real, prove me wrong. Bring me my money, and maybe we’ll talk.”
She never heard from him again.
Romance scams are uniquely painful because they prey on trust, hope, and human connection. Beth said, “People would be surprised at how much this happens, how much it goes on.”
Like many victims, she wishes there had been a tool to fact-check the links, the stories, and the too-good-to-be-true excuses. That’s where technology like McAfee’s Scam Detector could have made all the difference, flagging suspicious links and warning her before thousands of dollars vanished.
Romance scams thrive on silence. Victims often feel embarrassed, but Beth wants her story out there.
“It would have been really good if there was technology where I could have checked these links to fact-check all of that,” she reflected.
Her experience is a reminder that scammers aren’t just after money—they target trust. By sharing her story, Beth hopes others will pause before sending money to someone they’ve never met in person. And with tools like McAfee’s Scam Detector, more people can spot the lies before love turns into loss.
The post “If You’re Real, Prove Me Wrong”: Beth’s Romance Scam Story appeared first on McAfee Blog.
Deshawn never thought he’d be the kind of person to fall for a scam. At 30, he was tech-savvy, careful, and always aware of the world around him. But one busy afternoon, a single text message changed everything. What looked like a routine delivery notification turned into a $420 lesson that convenience can be a scammer’s greatest weapon.“I thought this stuff only happened to older people.” That’s what Deshawn, 30, told us after a fake delivery text nearly drained his bank account. It all started on what he thought was just a busy day.
Deshawn was juggling errands when a text came through: a delivery company said his package was being held at a facility. To recover it, all he had to do was click the link.
Since he really was expecting packages, it felt routine. He tapped the link, entered his information, and moved on.
The next day, his bank flagged a transaction: $420 spent—in Jamaica. Deshawn had never been there. That’s when it clicked. The delivery text was a scam, and the fraudsters had his financial info.
“When I saw purchases hitting my card, I felt like an idiot,” Deshawn admitted. “I thought things like this only happened to older people.”
But scams don’t discriminate. Deshawn realized the very convenience he relied on—quick taps, fast responses—was exactly what scammers exploit.
“Even if you’re detail-oriented, even if you check all the boxes, it can happen to you,” he said.
Scammers count on assumptions. They count on younger people thinking they’re “too smart” or “too aware” to get tricked. But as Deshawn’s story shows, anyone can fall for a scam—especially when it looks like an everyday task, like recovering a package.
“It’s crazy how a device in your pocket and one tap can take your money,” Deshawn reflected. He wishes more people his age would share their experiences, so others wouldn’t let their guard down.
Final Word from Deshawn
“I used to laugh at the idea of being a scam target. Now I know it can happen to anyone. Sharing my story means maybe the next person will pause before they tap.”
The post A Fake Delivery Text Nearly Cost Deshawn Hundreds: His Scam Story appeared first on McAfee Blog.
It seems like every manufacturer of anything electrical that goes in the house wants to be part of the IoT story these days. Further, they all want their own app, which means you have to go to gazillions of bespoke software products to control your things. And they're all - with very few exceptions - terrible:
That's to control the curtains in my office and the master bedroom, but the hubs (you need two, because the range is rubbish) have stopped communicating.
That one is for the spa, but it looks like the service it's meant to authenticate to has disappeared, so now, you can't.
And my most recent favourite, Advantage Air, which controls the many tens of thousands of dollars' worth of air conditioning we've just put in. Yes, I'm on the same network, and yes, the touch screen has power and is connected to the network. I know that because it looks like this:
That might look like I took the photo in 2013, but no, that's the current generation app, complete with Android tablet now fixed to the wall. Fortunately, I can gleefully ignore it as all the entities are now exposed in Home Assistant (HA), then persisted into Apple Home via HomeKit Bridge, where they appear on our iThings. (Which also means I can replace that tablet with a nice iPad Mini running Apple Home and put the Android into the server rack, where it still needs to act as the controller for the system.)
Anyway, the point is that when you go all in on IoT, you're dealing with a lot of rubbish apps all doing pretty basic stuff: turn things on, turn things off, close things, etc. HA is great as it abstracts away the crappy apps, and now, it also does something much, much cooler than just all this basic functionality...
Start by thinking of the whole IoT ecosystem as simply being triggers and actions. Triggers can be based on explicit activities (such as pushing a button), observable conditions (such as the temperature in a room), schedules, events and a range of other things that can be used to kick off an action. The actions then include closing a garage door, playing an audible announcement on a speaker, pushing an alert to a mobile device and like triggers, many other things as well. That's the obvious stuff, but you can get really creative when you start considering devices like this:
That's a Sonoff IoT water valve, and yes, it has its own app 🤦♂️ But because it's Zigbee-based, it's very easy to incorporate it into HA, which means now, the swag of "actions" at my disposal includes turning on a hose. Cool, but boring if you're just watering the garden. Let's do something more interesting instead:
The valve is inline with the hose which is pointing upwards, right above the wall that faces the road and has one of these mounted on it:
That's a Ubiquiti G4 Pro doorbell (full disclosure: Ubiquiti has sent me all the gear I'm using in this post), and to extend the nomenclature used earlier, it has many different events that HA can use as triggers, including a press of the button. Tie it all together and you get this:
Not only does a press of the doorbell trigger the hose on Halloween, it also triggers Lenny Troll, who's a bit hard to hear, so you gotta lean in real close 🤣 C'mon, they offered "trick" as one of the options!
Enough mucking around, let's get to the serious bits and per the title, the AI components. I was reading through the new features of HA 2025.8 (they do a monthly release in this form), and thought the chicken counter example was pretty awesome. Counting the number of chickens in the coop is a hard problem to solve with traditional sensors, but if you've got a camera that take a decent photo and an AI service to interpret it, suddenly you have some cool options. Which got me thinking about my rubbish bins:
The red one has to go out on the road by about 07:00 every Tuesday (that's general rubbish), and the yellow one has to go out every other Tuesday (that's recycling). Sometimes, we only remember at the last moment and other times, we remember right as the garbage truck passes by, potentially meaning another fortnight of overstuffing the bin. But I already had a Ubiquiti G6 Bullet pointing at that side of the house (with a privacy blackout configured to avoid recording the neighbours), so now it just takes a simple automation:
FreshRSS - id: bin_presence_check
alias: Bin presence check
mode: single
trigger:
- platform: state
entity_id: binary_sensor.laundry_side_motion
to: "off"
for:
minutes: 1
condition:
- condition: time
weekday:
- mon
- tue
action:
- service: ai_task.generate_data
data:
task_name: Bin presence check
instructions: >-
Look at the image and answer ONLY in JSON with EXACTLY these keys:
- bin_yellow_present: true if a rubbish bin with a yellow lid is visible, else false
- bin_red_present: true if a rubbish bin with a red lid is visible, else false
Do not include any other keys or text.
structure:
bin_yellow_present:
selector:
boolean:
bin_red_present:
selector:
boolean:
attachments:
media_content_id: media-source://camera/camera.laundry_side_medium
media_content_type: image/jpeg
response_variable: result
- service: "input_boolean.turn_{{ 'on' if result.data.bin_yellow_present else 'off' }}"
target:
entity_id: input_boolean.yellow_bin_present
- service: "input_boolean.turn_{{ 'on' if result.data.bin_red_present else 'off' }}"
target:
entity_id: input_boolean.red_bin_presentOk, so it's a 40-line automation, but it's also pretty human-readable:
From that, I can then create an alert if the correct bin is still present when it should be out on the road. Amazing! I'd always wanted to do something to this effect but had assumed it would involve sensors on the bins themselves. Not with AI though 😊
And then I started getting carried away. I already had a Ubiquiti AI LPR (that's a "license plate reader") camera on the driveway and it just happened to be pointing towards the letter box. Now, I've had Zigbee-based Aqara door and window sensors (they're effectively reed switches) on the letter box for ages now (one for where the letters go in, and one for the packages), and they announce the presence of mail via the in-ceiling Sonos speakers in the house. This is genuinely useful, and now, it's even better:
I screen-capped that on my Apple Watch whilst I was out shopping, and even though it was hard to make out the tiny picture on my wrist, I had no trouble reading the content of the alert. Here's how it works:
- id: letterbox_and_package_alert
alias: Letterbox/Package alerts
mode: single
trigger:
- id: letter
platform: state
entity_id: binary_sensor.letterbox
to: "on"
- id: package
platform: state
entity_id: binary_sensor.package_box
to: "on"
variables:
event: "{{ trigger.id }}" # "letter" or "package"
title: >-
{{ "You've got mail" if event == "letter" else "Package delivery" }}
message: >-
{{ "Someone just left you a letter" if event == "letter" else "Someone just dropped a package" }}
tts_message: >-
{{ "You've got mail" if event == "letter" else "You've got a package" }}
file_prefix: "{{ 'letterbox' if event == 'letter' else 'package_box' }}"
file_name: "{{ file_prefix }}_{{ now().strftime('%Y%m%d_%H%M%S') }}"
snapshot_path: "/config/www/snapshots/{{ file_name }}.jpg"
snapshot_url: "/local/snapshots/{{ file_name }}.jpg"
action:
- service: camera.snapshot
target:
entity_id: camera.driveway_medium
data:
filename: "{{ snapshot_path }}"
- service: script.hunt_tts
data:
message: "{{ tts_message }}"
- service: ai_task.generate_data
data:
task_name: "Mailbox person/vehicle description"
instructions: >-
Look at the image and briefly describe any person
and/or vehicle standing near the mailbox. They must
be immediately next to the mailbox, and describe
what they look like and what they're wearing.
Keep it under 20 words.
attachments:
media_content_id: media-source://camera/camera.driveway_medium
media_content_type: image/jpeg
response_variable: description
- service: notify.adult_iphones
data:
title: "{{ title }}"
message: "{{ (description | default({})).data | default('no description') }}"
data:
image: "{{ snapshot_url }}"This is really helpful for figuring out which of the endless deliveries we seem to get are worth "downing tools" for and going out to retrieve mail. Equally useful is the most recent use of an AI task, recorded just today (and shared with the subject's permission):
Like packages, we seem to receive endless visitors and getting an idea of who's at the door before going anywhere near it is pretty handy. We do get video on phone (and, as you can see, iPad), but that's not necessarily always at hand, and this way the kids have an idea of who it is too. Here's the code (it's a separate automation that plays the doorbell chime):
- id: doorbell_ring_play_ai
alias: The doorbell is ringing, use AI to describe the person
trigger:
platform: state
entity_id: binary_sensor.doorbell_ring
to: 'on'
action:
- service: ai_task.generate_data
data:
task_name: "Doorbell visitor description"
instructions: >-
Look at the image and briefly describe how many people you see and what they're wearing, but don't refer to "the image" in your response.
If they're carrying something, also explain that but don't mention it if they're not.
If you can recognise what job they might, please include this information too, but don't mention it if you don't know.
If you can tell their gender or if they're a child, mention that too.
Don't tell me anything you don't know, only what you do know.
This will be broadcast inside a house so should be conversational, preferably summarised into a single sentence.
attachments:
media_content_id: media-source://camera/camera.doorbell
media_content_type: image/jpeg
response_variable: description
- service: script.hunt_tts
data:
message: "{{ (description | default({})).data | default('I have no idea who is at the door') }}"I've been gradually refining that prompt, and it's doing a pretty good job of it at the moment. Hear how the response noted his involvement in "detailing"? That's because the company logo on his shirt includes the word, and indeed, he was here to detail the cars.
This is all nerdy goodness that has blown hours of my time for what, on the surface, seems trivial. But it's by playing with technologies like this and finding unusual use cases for them that we end up building things of far greater significance. To bring it back to my opening point, IoT is starting to go well beyond the rubbish apps at the start of this post, and we'll soon be seeing genuinely useful, life-improving implementations. Bring on more AI-powered goodness for Halloween 2025!
Edit: I should have included this in the original article, but the ai_task service is using OpenAI so all processing is done in the cloud, not locally on HA. That requires and API key and payment, although I reckon that pricing is pretty reasonable (and the vast majority of those requests are from testing):
The cybersecurity community on Reddit responded in disbelief this month when a self-described Air National Guard member with top secret security clearance began questioning the arrangement they’d made with company called DSLRoot, which was paying $250 a month to plug a pair of laptops into the Redditor’s high-speed Internet connection in the United States. This post examines the history and provenance of DSLRoot, one of the oldest “residential proxy” networks with origins in Russia and Eastern Europe.
The query about DSLRoot came from a Reddit user “Sacapoopie,” who did not respond to questions. This user has since deleted the original question from their post, although some of their replies to other Reddit cybersecurity enthusiasts remain in the thread. The original post was indexed here by archive.is, and it began with a question:
“I have been getting paid 250$ a month by a residential IP network provider named DSL root to host devices in my home,” Sacapoopie wrote. “They are on a separate network than what we use for personal use. They have dedicated DSL connections (one per host) to the ISP that provides the DSL coverage. My family used Starlink. Is this stupid for me to do? They just sit there and I get paid for it. The company pays the internet bill too.”
Many Redditors said they assumed Sacapoopie’s post was a joke, and that nobody with a cybersecurity background and top-secret (TS/SCI) clearance would agree to let some shady residential proxy company introduce hardware into their network. Other readers pointed to a slew of posts from Sacapoopie in the Cybersecurity subreddit over the past two years about their work on cybersecurity for the Air National Guard.
When pressed for more details by fellow Redditors, Sacapoopie described the equipment supplied by DSLRoot as “just two laptops hardwired into a modem, which then goes to a dsl port in the wall.”
“When I open the computer, it looks like [they] have some sort of custom application that runs and spawns several cmd prompts,” the Redditor explained. “All I can infer from what I see in them is they are making connections.”
When asked how they became acquainted with DSLRoot, Sacapoopie told another user they discovered the company and reached out after viewing an advertisement on a social media platform.
“This was probably 5-6 years ago,” Sacapoopie wrote. “Since then I just communicate with a technician from that company and I help trouble shoot connectivity issues when they arise.”
Reached for comment, DSLRoot said its brand has been unfairly maligned thanks to that Reddit discussion. The unsigned email said DSLRoot is fully transparent about its goals and operations, adding that it operates under full consent from its “regional agents,” the company’s term for U.S. residents like Sacapoopie.
“As although we support honest journalism, we’re against of all kinds of ‘low rank/misleading Yellow Journalism’ done for the sake of cheap hype,” DSLRoot wrote in reply. “It’s obvious to us that whoever is doing this, is either lacking a proper understanding of the subject or doing it intentionally to gain exposure by misleading those who lack proper understanding,” DSLRoot wrote in answer to questions about the company’s intentions.
“We monitor our clients and prohibit any illegal activity associated with our residential proxies,” DSLRoot continued. “We honestly didn’t know that the guy who made the Reddit post was a military guy. Be it an African-American granny trying to pay her rent or a white kid trying to get through college, as long as they can provide an Internet line or host phones for us — we’re good.”
DSLRoot is sold as a residential proxy service on the forum BlackHatWorld under the name DSLRoot and GlobalSolutions. The company is based in the Bahamas and was formed in 2012. The service is advertised to people who are not in the United States but who want to seem like they are. DSLRoot pays people in the United States to run the company’s hardware and software — including 5G mobile devices — and in return it rents those IP addresses as dedicated proxies to customers anywhere in the world — priced at $190 per month for unrestricted access to all locations.
The DSLRoot website.
The GlobalSolutions account on BlackHatWorld lists a Telegram account and a WhatsApp number in Mexico. DSLRoot’s profile on the marketing agency digitalpoint.com from 2010 shows their previous username on the forum was “Incorptoday.” GlobalSolutions user accounts at bitcointalk[.]org and roclub[.]com include the email clickdesk@instantvirtualcreditcards[.]com.
Passive DNS records from DomainTools.com show instantvirtualcreditcards[.]com shared a host back then — 208.85.1.164 — with just a handful of domains, including dslroot[.]com, regacard[.]com, 4groot[.]com, residential-ip[.]com, 4gemperor[.]com, ip-teleport[.]com, proxysource[.]net and proxyrental[.]net.
Cyber intelligence firm Intel 471 finds GlobalSolutions registered on BlackHatWorld in 2016 using the email address prepaidsolutions@yahoo.com. This user shared that their birthday is March 7, 1984.
Several negative reviews about DSLRoot on the forums noted that the service was operated by a BlackHatWorld user calling himself “USProxyKing.” Indeed, Intel 471 shows this user told fellow forum members in 2013 to contact him at the Skype username “dslroot.”
USProxyKing on BlackHatWorld, soliciting installations of his adware via torrents and file-sharing sites.
USProxyKing had a reputation for spamming the forums with ads for his residential proxy service, and he ran a “pay-per-install” program where he paid affiliates a small commission each time one of their websites resulted in the installation of his unspecified “adware” programs — presumably a program that turned host PCs into proxies. On the other end of the business, USProxyKing sold that pay-per-install access to others wishing to distribute questionable software — at $1 per installation.
Private messages indexed by Intel 471 show USProxyKing also raised money from nearly 20 different BlackHatWorld members who were promised shareholder positions in a new business that would offer robocalling services capable of placing 2,000 calls per minute.
Constella Intelligence, a platform that tracks data exposed in breaches, finds that same IP address GlobalSolutions used to register at BlackHatWorld was also used to create accounts at a handful of sites, including a GlobalSolutions user account at WebHostingTalk that supplied the email address incorptoday@gmail.com. Also registered to incorptoday@gmail.com are the domains dslbay[.]com, dslhub[.]net, localsim[.]com, rdslpro[.]com, virtualcards[.]biz/cc, and virtualvisa[.]cc.
Recall that DSLRoot’s profile on digitalpoint.com was previously named Incorptoday. DomainTools says incorptoday@gmail.com is associated with almost two dozen domains going back to 2008, including incorptoday[.]com, a website that offers to incorporate businesses in several states, including Delaware, Florida and Nevada, for prices ranging from $450 to $550.
As we can see in this archived copy of the site from 2013, IncorpToday also offered a premiere service for $750 that would allow the customer’s new company to have a retail checking account, with no questions asked.
Global Solutions is able to provide access to the U.S. banking system by offering customers prepaid cards that can be loaded with a variety of virtual payment instruments that were popular in Russian-speaking countries at the time, including WebMoney. The cards are limited to $500 balances, but non-Westerners can use them to anonymously pay for goods and services at a variety of Western companies. Cardnow[.]ru, another domain registered to incorptoday@gmail.com, demonstrates this in action.
A copy of Incorptoday’s website from 2013 offers non-US residents a service to incorporate a business in Florida, Delaware or Nevada, along with a no-questions-asked checking account, for $750.
The oldest domain (2008) registered to incorptoday@gmail.com is andrei[.]me; another is called andreigolos[.]com. DomainTools says these and other domains registered to that email address include the registrant name Andrei Holas, from Huntsville, Ala.
Public records indicate Andrei Holas has lived with his brother — Aliaksandr Holas — at two different addresses in Alabama. Those records state that Andrei Holas’ birthday is in March 1984, and that his brother is slightly younger. The younger brother did not respond to a request for comment.
Andrei Holas maintained an account on the Russian social network Vkontakte under the email address ryzhik777@gmail.com, an address that shows up in numerous records hacked and leaked from Russian government entities over the past few years.
Those records indicate Andrei Holas and his brother are from Belarus and have maintained an address in Moscow for some time (that address is roughly three blocks away from the main headquarters of the Russian FSB, the successor intelligence agency to the KGB). Hacked Russian banking records show Andrei Holas’ birthday is March 7, 1984 — the same birth date listed by GlobalSolutions on BlackHatWorld.
A 2010 post by ryzhik777@gmail.com at the Russian-language forum Ulitka explains that the poster was having trouble getting his B1/B2 visa to visit his brother in the United States, even though he’d previously been approved for two separate guest visas and a student visa. It remains unclear if one, both, or neither of the Holas brothers still lives in the United States. Andrei explained in 2010 that his brother was an American citizen.
We can all wag our fingers at military personnel who should undoubtedly know better than to install Internet hardware from strangers, but in truth there is an endless supply of U.S. residents who will resell their Internet connection if it means they can make a few bucks out of it. And these days, there are plenty of residential proxy providers who will make it worth your while.
Traditionally, residential proxy networks have been constructed using malicious software that quietly turns infected systems into traffic relays that are then sold in shadowy online forums. Most often, this malware gets bundled with popular cracked software and video files that are uploaded to file-sharing networks and that secretly turn the host device into a traffic relay. In fact, USPRoxyKing bragged that he routinely achieved thousands of installs per week via this method alone.
There are a number of residential proxy networks that entice users to monetize their unused bandwidth (inviting you to violate the terms of service of your ISP in the process); others, like DSLRoot, act as a communal VPN, and by using the service you gain access to the connections of other proxies (users) by default, but you also agree to share your connection with others.
Indeed, Intel 471’s archives show the GlobalSolutions and DSLRoot accounts routinely received private messages from forum users who were college students or young people trying to make ends meet. Those messages show that many of DSLRoot’s “regional agents” often sought commissions to refer friends interested in reselling their home Internet connections (DSLRoot would offer to cover the monthly cost of the agent’s home Internet connection).
But in an era when North Korean hackers are relentlessly posing as Western IT workers by paying people to host laptop farms in the United States, letting strangers run laptops, mobile devices or any other hardware on your network seems like an awfully risky move regardless of your station in life. As several Redditors pointed out in Sacapoopie’s thread, an Arizona woman was sentenced in July 2025 to 102 months in prison for hosting a laptop farm that helped North Korean hackers secure jobs at more than 300 U.S. companies, including Fortune 500 firms.
Lloyd Davies is the founder of Infrawatch, a London-based security startup that tracks residential proxy networks. Davies said he reverse engineered the software that powers DSLRoot’s proxy service, and found it phones home to the aforementioned domain proxysource[.]net, which sells a service that promises to “get your ads live in multiple cities without getting banned, flagged or ghosted” (presumably a reference to CraigsList ads).
Davies said he found the DSLRoot installer had capabilities to remotely control residential networking equipment across multiple vendor brands.
Image: Infrawatch.app.
“The software employs vendor-specific exploits and hardcoded administrative credentials, suggesting DSLRoot pre-configures equipment before deployment,” Davies wrote in an analysis published today. He said the software performs WiFi network enumeration to identify nearby wireless networks, thereby “potentially expanding targeting capabilities beyond the primary internet connection.”
It’s unclear exactly when the USProxyKing was usurped from his throne, but DSLRoot and its proxy offerings are not what they used to be. Davies said the entire DSLRoot network now has fewer than 300 nodes nationwide, mostly systems on DSL providers like CenturyLink and Frontier.
On Aug. 17, GlobalSolutions posted to BlackHatWorld saying, “We’re restructuring our business model by downgrading to ‘DSL only’ lines (no mobile or cable).” Asked via email about the changes, DSLRoot blamed the decline in his customers on the proliferation of residential proxy services.
“These days it has become almost impossible to compete in this niche as everyone is selling residential proxies and many companies want you to install a piece of software on your phone or desktop so they can resell your residential IPs on a much larger scale,” DSLRoot explained. “So-called ‘legal botnets’ as we see them.”
Article tags
Article tags
We’re standing at the threshold of a new era in cybersecurity threats. While most consumers are still getting familiar with ChatGPT and basic AI chatbots, cybercriminals are already moving to the next frontier: Agentic AI. Unlike the AI tools you may have tried that simply respond to your questions, these new systems can think, plan, and act independently, making them the perfect digital accomplices for sophisticated scammers. The next evolution of cybercrime is here, and it’s learning to think for itself.
The threat is already here and growing rapidly. According to McAfee’s latest State of the Scamiverse report, the average American sees more than 14 scams every day, including an average of 3 deepfake videos. Even more concerning, detected deepfakes surged tenfold globally in the past year, with North America alone experiencing a 1,740% increase.
At McAfee, we’re seeing early warning signs of this shift, and we believe every consumer needs to understand what’s coming. The good news? By learning about these emerging threats now, you can protect yourself before they become widespread.
Before we dive into the threats, let’s break down what we’re actually talking about when we discuss AI and its evolution:
Traditional AI: The Helper
The AI most people know today works like a very sophisticated search engine or writing assistant. You ask it a question, it gives you an answer. You request help with a task, it provides suggestions. Think of ChatGPT, Google’s Gemini, or the AI features on your smartphone. They’re reactive tools that respond to your input but don’t take independent action.
Generative AI: The Creator
Generative AI, which powers many current scams, can create content like emails, images, or even fake videos (deepfakes). This technology has already made scams more convincing by cloning real human voices and eliminating telltale signs like poor grammar and obvious language errors.
The impact is already visible in the data. McAfee Labs found that for just $5 and 10 minutes of setup time, scammers can create powerful, realistic-looking deepfake video and audio scams using readily available tools. What once required experts weeks to produce can now be achieved for less than the cost of a latte—and in less time than it takes to drink it.
Agentic AI: The Independent Actor
Agentic AI represents a fundamental leap forward. These systems can think, make decisions, learn from mistakes, and work together to solve tough problems, just like a team of human experts. Unlike previous AI that waits for your commands, agentic AI can set its own goals, make plans to achieve them, and adapt when circumstances change
Key Characteristics of Agentic AI:
Gartner predicts that by 2028, a third of our interactions with AI will shift from simply typing commands to fully engaging with autonomous agents that can act on their own goals and intentions. Unfortunately, cybercriminals won’t be far behind in exploiting these capabilities.
Think of agentic AI as giving scammers their own team of tireless, intelligent apprentices that never sleep, never make mistakes, and get better at their job every day. Here’s how this digital apprenticeship makes scams exponentially more dangerous.
Traditional scammers spend hours manually researching targets, scrolling through social media profiles, and piecing together personal information. Agentic AI recon agents operate persistently and autonomously, self-prompting questions like “What data do I need to identify a weak point in this organization?” and then collecting it from social media, breach data, exposed APIs and cloud misconfigurations.
Unlike traditional phishing that uses static messages, agentic AI can dynamically update or alter their approach based on a recipient’s response, location, holidays, events, or the target’s interests, marking a significant shift from static attacks to highly adaptive and real-time social engineering threats.
An agentic AI scammer targeting you might start with a LinkedIn message about a job opportunity. If you don’t respond, it switches to an email about a package delivery. If that fails, it tries a text message about suspicious account activity. Each attempt uses lessons learned from your previous reactions, becoming more convincing with every interaction.
AI-generated phishing emails achieve a 54% click-through rate compared to just 12% for their human-crafted counterparts. With agentic AI, scammers can create messages that don’t just look professional, they sound exactly like the people and organizations you trust.
The technology is already sophisticated enough to fool even cautious consumers. As McAfee’s latest research shows, social media users shared over 500,000 deepfakes in 2023 alone. The tools have become so accessible that scammers can now create convincing real-time avatars for video calls, allowing them to impersonate anyone from your boss to your bank representative during live conversations.
Perhaps most concerning is agentic AI’s ability to learn and improve. As the AI interacts with more victims over time, it gathers data on what types of messages or approaches work best for certain demographics, adapting itself and refining future campaigns to make each subsequent attack more powerful, convincing, and effective. This means that every failed scam attempt makes the AI smarter for its next victim. Understanding how agentic AI will transform specific types of scams helps us prepare for what’s coming. Here are the most concerning developments:
Multi-Stage Campaign Orchestration
Agentic AI can potentially orchestrate complex multi-stage social engineering attacks, leveraging data from one interaction to drive the next one. Instead of simple one-and-done phishing emails, expect sophisticated campaigns that unfold over weeks or months.
Automated Spear Phishing at Scale
Traditional spear phishing required manual research and customization for each target. In the new world order, malicious AI agents will autonomously harvest data from social media profiles, craft phishing messages, and tailor them to individual targets without human intervention. This means cybercriminals can now launch thousands of highly personalized attacks simultaneously, each one crafted specifically for its intended victim.
Real-Time Adaptive Attacks
When a target hesitates or questions an initial approach, agents adjust their tactics immediately based on the response. This continuous refinement makes each interaction more convincing than the last, wearing down even skeptical targets through persistence and learning. Traditional red flags like “This seems suspicious” or “Let me verify this” no longer end the attack, they just trigger the AI to try a different approach.
Cross-Platform Coordination
These autonomous systems now independently launch coordinated phishing campaigns across multiple channels simultaneously, operating with an efficiency human attackers cannot match. An agentic AI scammer might contact you via email, text message, phone call, and social media—all as part of a coordinated campaign designed to overwhelm your defenses.
The rise of agentic AI scams requires a fundamental shift in how we think about cybersecurity. Traditional advice like “watch for poor grammar” no longer applies. Here’s what you need to know to protect yourself:
Since agentic AI eliminates traditional warning signs, focus on these behavioral red flags:
High-Priority Warning Signs:
Emotional urgency: Messages designed to make you panic, feel guilty, or act without thinking
Requests for unusual actions: Being asked to do something outside normal procedures
Isolation tactics: Instructions not to tell anyone else or to handle something “confidentially”
Multiple contact attempts: Being contacted through several channels about the same issue
Perfect personalization: Messages that seem to know too much about your specific situation
At McAfee, we understand that fighting AI-powered attacks requires AI-powered defenses. Our security solutions are designed to detect and stop sophisticated scams before they reach you. McAfee’s Scam Detector provides lightning-fast alerts, automatically spotting scams and blocking risky links even if you click them, with all-in-one protection that keeps you safer across text, email, and video. Our AI analyzes incoming messages using advanced pattern recognition that can identify AI-generated content, even when it’s grammatically perfect and highly personalized.
Scam Detector keeps you safer across text, email, and video, providing comprehensive coverage against multi-channel agentic AI campaigns. Beyond analyzing message content, our system evaluates sender behavior patterns, communication timing, and request characteristics that may indicate AI-generated scams. Just as agentic AI attacks learn and evolve, our detection systems continuously improve their ability to identify new threat patterns.
Protecting yourself from agentic AI scams requires combining smart technology with informed human judgment. Security experts believe it’s highly likely that bad actors have already begun weaponizing agentic AI, and the sooner organizations and individuals can build up defenses, train awareness, and invest in stronger security controls, the better they will be equipped to outpace AI-powered adversaries.
We’re entering an era of AI versus AI, where the speed and sophistication of both attacks and defenses will continue to escalate. According to IBM’s 2025 Threat Intelligence Index, threat actors are pursuing bigger, broader campaigns than in the past, partly due to adopting generative AI tools that help them carry out more attacks in less time.
While the threat landscape is evolving rapidly, the combination of human intelligence and AI-powered security tools gives us powerful advantages. Humans excel at recognizing context, understanding emotional manipulation, and making nuanced judgments that AI still struggles with. When combined with AI’s ability to process vast amounts of data and detect subtle patterns, this creates a formidable defense.
The rise of agentic AI represents both a significant threat and an opportunity. While cybercriminals will certainly exploit these technologies to create more sophisticated scams, we’re not defenseless. By understanding how these systems work, recognizing the new threat landscape, and combining human wisdom with AI-powered protection tools like McAfee‘s Scam Detector, we can stay ahead of the threats.
The key insight is that while AI can mimic human communication and behavior with unprecedented accuracy, it still relies on exploiting fundamental human psychology—our desire to help, our fear of consequences, and our tendency to trust. By developing better awareness of these psychological vulnerabilities and implementing verification protocols that don’t depend on technological red flags, we can maintain our security even as the threats become more sophisticated.
Remember: in the age of agentic AI, the most important security tool you have is still your human judgment. Trust your instincts, verify before you act, and never let urgency override prudence, no matter how convincing the request might seem.
The post How Agentic AI Will Be Weaponized for Social Engineering Attacks appeared first on McAfee Blog.
A 22-year-old Oregon man has been arrested on suspicion of operating “Rapper Bot,” a massive botnet used to power a service for launching distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks against targets — including a March 2025 DDoS that knocked Twitter/X offline. The Justice Department asserts the suspect and an unidentified co-conspirator rented out the botnet to online extortionists, and tried to stay off the radar of law enforcement by ensuring that their botnet was never pointed at KrebsOnSecurity.
The control panel for the Rapper Bot botnet greets users with the message “Welcome to the Ball Pit, Now with refrigerator support,” an apparent reference to a handful of IoT-enabled refrigerators that were enslaved in their DDoS botnet.
On August 6, 2025, federal agents arrested Ethan J. Foltz of Springfield, Ore. on suspicion of operating Rapper Bot, a globally dispersed collection of tens of thousands of hacked Internet of Things (IoT) devices.
The complaint against Foltz explains the attacks usually clocked in at more than two terabits of junk data per second (a terabit is one trillion bits of data), which is more than enough traffic to cause serious problems for all but the most well-defended targets. The government says Rapper Bot consistently launched attacks that were “hundreds of times larger than the expected capacity of a typical server located in a data center,” and that some of its biggest attacks exceeded six terabits per second.
Indeed, Rapper Bot was reportedly responsible for the March 10, 2025 attack that caused intermittent outages on Twitter/X. The government says Rapper Bot’s most lucrative and frequent customers were involved in extorting online businesses — including numerous gambling operations based in China.
The criminal complaint was written by Elliott Peterson, an investigator with the Defense Criminal Investigative Service (DCIS), the criminal investigative division of the Department of Defense (DoD) Office of Inspector General. The complaint notes the DCIS got involved because several Internet addresses maintained by the DoD were the target of Rapper Bot attacks.
Peterson said he tracked Rapper Bot to Foltz after a subpoena to an ISP in Arizona that was hosting one of the botnet’s control servers showed the account was paid for via PayPal. More legal process to PayPal revealed Foltz’s Gmail account and previously used IP addresses. A subpoena to Google showed the defendant searched security blogs constantly for news about Rapper Bot, and for updates about competing DDoS-for-hire botnets.
According to the complaint, after having a search warrant served on his residence the defendant admitted to building and operating Rapper Bot, sharing the profits 50/50 with a person he claimed to know only by the hacker handle “Slaykings.” Foltz also shared with investigators the logs from his Telegram chats, wherein Foltz and Slaykings discussed how best to stay off the radar of law enforcement investigators while their competitors were getting busted.
Specifically, the two hackers chatted about a May 20 attack against KrebsOnSecurity.com that clocked in at more than 6.3 terabits of data per second. The brief attack was notable because at the time it was the largest DDoS that Google had ever mitigated (KrebsOnSecurity sits behind the protection of Project Shield, a free DDoS defense service that Google provides to websites offering news, human rights, and election-related content).
The May 2025 DDoS was launched by an IoT botnet called Aisuru, which I discovered was operated by a 21-year-old man in Brazil named Kaike Southier Leite. This individual was more commonly known online as “Forky,” and Forky told me he wasn’t afraid of me or U.S. federal investigators. Nevertheless, the complaint against Foltz notes that Forky’s botnet seemed to diminish in size and firepower at the same time that Rapper Bot’s infection numbers were on the upswing.
“Both FOLTZ and Slaykings were very dismissive of attention seeking activities, the most extreme of which, in their view, was to launch DDoS attacks against the website of the prominent cyber security journalist Brian Krebs,” Peterson wrote in the criminal complaint.
“You see, they’ll get themselves [expletive],” Slaykings wrote in response to Foltz’s comments about Forky and Aisuru bringing too much heat on themselves.
“Prob cuz [redacted] hit krebs,” Foltz wrote in reply.
“Going against Krebs isn’t a good move,” Slaykings concurred. “It isn’t about being a [expletive] or afraid, you just get a lot of problems for zero money. Childish, but good. Let them die.”
“Ye, it’s good tho, they will die,” Foltz replied.
The government states that just prior to Foltz’s arrest, Rapper Bot had enslaved an estimated 65,000 devices globally. That may sound like a lot, but the complaint notes the defendants weren’t interested in making headlines for building the world’s largest or most powerful botnet.
Quite the contrary: The complaint asserts that the accused took care to maintain their botnet in a “Goldilocks” size — ensuring that “the number of devices afforded powerful attacks while still being manageable to control and, in the hopes of Foltz and his partners, small enough to not be detected.”
The complaint states that several days later, Foltz and Slaykings returned to discussing what that they expected to befall their rival group, with Slaykings stating, “Krebs is very revenge. He won’t stop until they are [expletive] to the bone.”
“Surprised they have any bots left,” Foltz answered.
“Krebs is not the one you want to have on your back. Not because he is scary or something, just because he will not give up UNTIL you are [expletive] [expletive]. Proved it with Mirai and many other cases.”
[Unknown expletives aside, that may well be the highest compliment I’ve ever been paid by a cybercriminal. I might even have part of that quote made into a t-shirt or mug or something. It’s also nice that they didn’t let any of their customers attack my site — if even only out of a paranoid sense of self-preservation.]
Foltz admitted to wiping the user and attack logs for the botnet approximately once a week, so investigators were unable to tally the total number of attacks, customers and targets of this vast crime machine. But the data that was still available showed that from April 2025 to early August, Rapper Bot conducted over 370,000 attacks, targeting 18,000 unique victims across 1,000 networks, with the bulk of victims residing in China, Japan, the United States, Ireland and Hong Kong (in that order).
According to the government, Rapper Bot borrows much of its code from fBot, a DDoS malware strain also known as Satori. In 2020, authorities in Northern Ireland charged a then 20-year-old man named Aaron “Vamp” Sterritt with operating fBot with a co-conspirator. U.S. prosecutors are still seeking Sterritt’s extradition to the United States. fBot is itself a variation of the Mirai IoT botnet that has ravaged the Internet with DDoS attacks since its source code was leaked back in 2016.
The complaint says Foltz and his partner did not allow most customers to launch attacks that were more than 60 seconds in duration — another way they tried to keep public attention to the botnet at a minimum. However, the government says the proprietors also had special arrangements with certain high-paying clients that allowed much larger and longer attacks.
The accused and his alleged partner made light of this blog post about the fallout from one of their botnet attacks.
Most people who have never been on the receiving end of a monster DDoS attack have no idea of the cost and disruption that such sieges can bring. The DCIS’s Peterson wrote that he was able to test the botnet’s capabilities while interviewing Foltz, and that found that “if this had been a server upon which I was running a website, using services such as load balancers, and paying for both outgoing and incoming data, at estimated industry average rates the attack (2+ Terabits per second times 30 seconds) might have cost the victim anywhere from $500 to $10,000.”
“DDoS attacks at this scale often expose victims to devastating financial impact, and a potential alternative, network engineering solutions that mitigate the expected attacks such as overprovisioning, i.e. increasing potential Internet capacity, or DDoS defense technologies, can themselves be prohibitively expensive,” the complaint continues. “This ‘rock and a hard place’ reality for many victims can leave them acutely exposed to extortion demands – ‘pay X dollars and the DDoS attacks stop’.”
The Telegram chat records show that the day before Peterson and other federal agents raided Foltz’s residence, Foltz allegedly told his partner he’d found 32,000 new devices that were vulnerable to a previously unknown exploit.
Foltz and Slaykings discussing the discovery of an IoT vulnerability that will give them 32,000 new devices.
Shortly before the search warrant was served on his residence, Foltz allegedly told his partner that “Once again we have the biggest botnet in the community.” The following day, Foltz told his partner that it was going to be a great day — the biggest so far in terms of income generated by Rapper Bot.
“I sat next to Foltz while the messages poured in — promises of $800, then $1,000, the proceeds ticking up as the day went on,” Peterson wrote. “Noticing a change in Foltz’ behavior and concerned that Foltz was making changes to the botnet configuration in real time, Slaykings asked him ‘What’s up?’ Foltz deftly typed out some quick responses. Reassured by Foltz’ answer, Slaykings responded, ‘Ok, I’m the paranoid one.”
The case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Adam Alexander in the District of Alaska (at least some of the devices found to be infected with Rapper Bot were located there, and it is where Peterson is stationed). Foltz faces one count of aiding and abetting computer intrusions. If convicted, he faces a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison, although a federal judge is unlikely to award anywhere near that kind of sentence for a first-time conviction.
How do hackers hack phones? In several ways. But also, there are several ways you can prevent it from happening to you. The thing is that our phones are like little treasure chests. They’re loaded with plenty of personal data, and we use them to shop, bank, and take care of other personal and financial matters—all of which are of high value to identity thieves. However, you can protect yourself and your phone by knowing what to look out for and by taking a few simple steps. Let’s break it down by first understanding what phone hacking is, taking a look at some common attacks, and learning how you can prevent it.
Phone hacking refers to any method where an unauthorized third party gains access to your smartphone and its data. This isn’t just one single technique; it covers a wide range of cybercrimes. A phone hack can happen through software vulnerabilities, like the spyware campaigns throughout the years that could monitor calls and messages. It can also occur over unsecured networks, such as a hacker intercepting your data on public Wi-Fi. Sometimes, it’s as simple as physical access, where someone installs tracking software on an unattended device.
Hackers have multiple avenues of attacking your phone. Among these common methods are using malicious apps disguised as legitimate software, exploiting the vulnerabilities of unsecure public Wi-Fi networks, or deploying sophisticated zero-click exploits that require no interaction from you at all. The most common method, however, remains social engineering, where they trick you into giving them access. Let’s further explore these common hacking techniques below.
Whether hackers sneak it onto your phone by physically accessing your phone or by tricking you into installing it via a phony app, a sketchy website, or a phishing attack, hacking software can create problems for you in a couple of ways:
Some possible signs of hacking software on your phone include:
In all, hacking software can eat up system resources, create conflicts with other apps, and use your data or internet connection to pass your personal information into the hands of hackers.
This classic form of attack has been leveled at our computers for years. Phishing is where hackers impersonate a company or trusted individual to get access to your accounts or personal info or both. These attacks take many forms such as emails, texts, instant messages, and so forth, some of which can look really legitimate. Common to them are links to bogus sites that attempt to trick you into handing over personal info or that install malware to wreak havoc on your device or likewise steal information. Learning to spot a phishing attack is one way to keep yourself from falling victim to one.
Professional hackers can use dedicated technologies that search for vulnerable mobile devices with an open Bluetooth connection. Hackers can pull off these attacks when they are within range of your phone, up to 30 feet away, usually in a populated area. When hackers make a Bluetooth connection to your phone, they might access your data and info, yet that data and info must be downloaded while the phone is within range. This is a more sophisticated attack given the effort and technology involved.
In August of 2019, then CEO of Twitter had his phone hacked by SIM card swapping scam. In this type of scam, a hacker contacts your phone provider, pretends to be you, then asks for a replacement SIM card. Once the provider sends the new SIM to the hacker, the old SIM card is deactivated, and your phone number will be effectively stolen. This enables the hacker to take control of your phone calls, messages, among others. The task of impersonating someone else seems difficult, yet it happened to the CEO of a major tech company, underscoring the importance of protecting your personal info and identity online to prevent hackers from pulling off this and other crimes.
While a phone call itself cannot typically install malware on your device, it is a primary tool for social engineering, known as vishing or voice phishing. A hacker might call, impersonating your bank or tech support company, and trick you into revealing sensitive information like passwords or financial details. They might also try to convince you to install a malicious app. Another common tactic is the “one-ring” scam, where they hang up hoping you’ll call back a premium-rate number. To stay safe, be wary of unsolicited calls, never provide personal data, block suspicious numbers, and check that your call forwarding isn’t enabled.
Generally, a phone that is powered off is a difficult target for remote hackers. However, modern smartphones aren’t always truly off. Features like Apple’s Find My network can operate in a low-power mode, keeping certain radios active. Furthermore, if a device has been previously compromised with sophisticated firmware-level malware, it could activate upon startup. The more common risk involves data that was already stolen before the phone was turned off or if the device is physically stolen. While it’s an uncommon scenario, the only sure way to take a device offline and completely sever all power is by removing the battery, where possible.
Hacking a phone’s camera is referred to as camfecting, usually done through malware or spyware hidden within a rogue application. Once installed, these apps can gain unauthorized permission to access your camera and record video or capture images without your knowledge. Occasionally, vulnerabilities in a phone’s operating system (OS) have been discovered that could allow for this, though these are rare and usually patched quickly. Protect yourself by regularly reviewing app permissions in your phone’s settings—for both iOS and Android—and revoking camera access for any app that doesn’t absolutely need it. Always keep your OS and apps updated to the latest versions.
This is a long-standing debate with no simple answer. iPhones are generally considered more secure due to Apple’s walled garden approach: a closed ecosystem, a strict vetting process for the App Store, and timely security updates for all supported devices. Android’s open-source nature offers more flexibility but also creates a more fragmented ecosystem, where security updates can be delayed depending on the device manufacturer. However, both platforms use powerful security features like application sandboxing.
The most important factor is not the brand but your behavior. A user who practices good digital hygiene—using strong passwords, avoiding suspicious links, and vetting apps—is well-protected on any platform.
Detecting a phone hack early can save you from significant trouble. Watch for key red flags: your battery draining much faster than usual, unexpected spikes in your mobile data usage, a persistently hot device even when idle, or a sudden barrage of pop-up ads. You might also notice apps you don’t remember installing or find that your phone is running unusually slow. To check, go into your settings to review your battery and data usage reports for any strange activity. The most effective step you can take is to install a comprehensive security app, like McAfee® Mobile Security, to run an immediate scan and detect any threats.
Discovering that your phone has been hacked can be alarming, but acting quickly can help you regain control and protect your personal information. Here are the urgent steps to take so you can remove the hacker, secure your accounts, and prevent future intrusions.
While there are several ways a hacker can get into your phone and steal personal and critical information, here are a few tips to keep that from happening:
Your smartphone is central to your life, so protecting it is essential. Ultimately, your proactive security habits are your strongest defense against mobile hacking. Make a habit of keeping your operating system and apps updated, be cautious about the links you click and the networks you join, and use a comprehensive security solution like McAfee® Mobile Security.
By staying vigilant and informed, you can enjoy all the benefits of your mobile device with confidence and peace of mind. Stay tuned to McAfee for the latest on how to protect your digital world from emerging threats.
The post How Do Hackers Hack Phones and How Can I Prevent It? appeared first on McAfee Blog.
Cybercriminal groups peddling sophisticated phishing kits that convert stolen card data into mobile wallets have recently shifted their focus to targeting customers of brokerage services, new research shows. Undeterred by security controls at these trading platforms that block users from wiring funds directly out of accounts, the phishers have pivoted to using multiple compromised brokerage accounts in unison to manipulate the prices of foreign stocks.
Image: Shutterstock, WhataWin.
This so-called ‘ramp and dump‘ scheme borrows its name from age-old “pump and dump” scams, wherein fraudsters purchase a large number of shares in some penny stock, and then promote the company in a frenzied social media blitz to build up interest from other investors. The fraudsters dump their shares after the price of the penny stock increases to some degree, which usually then causes a sharp drop in the value of the shares for legitimate investors.
With ramp and dump, the scammers do not need to rely on ginning up interest in the targeted stock on social media. Rather, they will preposition themselves in the stock that they wish to inflate, using compromised accounts to purchase large volumes of it and then dumping the shares after the stock price reaches a certain value. In February 2025, the FBI said it was seeking information from victims of this scheme.
“In this variation, the price manipulation is primarily the result of controlled trading activity conducted by the bad actors behind the scam,” reads an advisory from the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), a private, non-profit organization that regulates member brokerage firms. “Ultimately, the outcome for unsuspecting investors is the same—a catastrophic collapse in share price that leaves investors with unrecoverable losses.”
Ford Merrill is a security researcher at SecAlliance, a CSIS Security Group company. Merrill said he has tracked recent ramp-and-dump activity to a bustling Chinese-language community that is quite openly selling advanced mobile phishing kits on Telegram.
“They will often coordinate with other actors and will wait until a certain time to buy a particular Chinese IPO [initial public offering] stock or penny stock,” said Merrill, who has been chronicling the rapid maturation and growth of the China-based phishing community over the past three years.
“They’ll use all these victim brokerage accounts, and if needed they’ll liquidate the account’s current positions, and will preposition themselves in that instrument in some account they control, and then sell everything when the price goes up,” he said. “The victim will be left with worthless shares of that equity in their account, and the brokerage may not be happy either.”
Merrill said the early days of these phishing groups — between 2022 and 2024 — were typified by phishing kits that used text messages to spoof the U.S. Postal Service or some local toll road operator, warning about a delinquent shipping or toll fee that needed paying. Recipients who clicked the link and provided their payment information at a fake USPS or toll operator site were then asked to verify the transaction by sharing a one-time code sent via text message.
In reality, the victim’s bank is sending that code to the mobile number on file for their customer because the fraudsters have just attempted to enroll that victim’s card details into a mobile wallet. If the visitor supplies that one-time code, their payment card is then added to a new mobile wallet on an Apple or Google device that is physically controlled by the phishers.
The phishing gangs typically load multiple stolen cards to digital wallets on a single Apple or Android device, and then sell those phones in bulk to scammers who use them for fraudulent e-commerce and tap-to-pay transactions.
An image from the Telegram channel for a popular Chinese mobile phishing kit vendor shows 10 mobile phones for sale, each loaded with 4-6 digital wallets from different financial institutions.
This China-based phishing collective exposed a major weakness common to many U.S.-based financial institutions that already require multi-factor authentication: The reliance on a single, phishable one-time token for provisioning mobile wallets. Happily, Merrill said many financial institutions that were caught flat-footed on this scam two years ago have since strengthened authentication requirements for onboarding new mobile wallets (such as requiring the card to be enrolled via the bank’s mobile app).
But just as squeezing one part of a balloon merely forces the air trapped inside to bulge into another area, fraudsters don’t go away when you make their current enterprise less profitable: They just shift their focus to a less-guarded area. And lately, that gaze has settled squarely on customers of the major brokerage platforms, Merrill said.
Merrill pointed to several Telegram channels operated by some of the more accomplished phishing kit sellers, which are full of videos demonstrating how every feature in their kits can be tailored to the attacker’s target. The video snippet below comes from the Telegram channel of “Outsider,” a popular Mandarin-speaking phishing kit vendor whose latest offering includes a number of ready-made templates for using text messages to phish brokerage account credentials and one-time codes.
According to Merrill, Outsider is a woman who previously went by the handle “Chenlun.” KrebsOnSecurity profiled Chenlun’s phishing empire in an October 2023 story about a China-based group that was phishing mobile customers of more than a dozen postal services around the globe. In that case, the phishing sites were using a Telegram bot that sent stolen credentials to the “@chenlun” Telegram account.
Chenlun’s phishing lures are sent via Apple’s iMessage and Google’s RCS service and spoof one of the major brokerage platforms, warning that the account has been suspended for suspicious activity and that recipients should log in and verify some information. The missives include a link to a phishing page that collects the customer’s username and password, and then asks the user to enter a one-time code that will arrive via SMS.
The new phish kit videos on Outsider’s Telegram channel only feature templates for Schwab customers, but Merrill said the kit can easily be adapted to target other brokerage platforms. One reason the fraudsters are picking on brokerage firms, he said, has to do with the way they handle multi-factor authentication.
Schwab clients are presented with two options for second factor authentication when they open an account. Users who select the option to only prompt for a code on untrusted devices can choose to receive it via text message, an automated inbound phone call, or an outbound call to Schwab. With the “always at login” option selected, users can choose to receive the code through the Schwab app, a text message, or a Symantec VIP mobile app.
In response to questions, Schwab said it regularly updates clients on emerging fraud trends, including this specific type, which the company addressed in communications sent to clients earlier this year.
The 2FA text message from Schwab warns recipients against giving away their one-time code.
“That message focused on trading-related fraud, highlighting both account intrusions and scams conducted through social media or messaging apps that deceive individuals into executing trades themselves,” Schwab said in a written statement. “We are aware and tracking this trend across several channels, as well as others like it, which attempt to exploit SMS-based verification with stolen credentials. We actively monitor for suspicious patterns and take steps to disrupt them. This activity is part of a broader, industry-wide threat, and we take a multi-layered approach to address and mitigate it.”
Other popular brokerage platforms allow similar methods for multi-factor authentication. Fidelity requires a username and password on initial login, and offers the ability to receive a one-time token via SMS, an automated phone call, or by approving a push notification sent through the Fidelity mobile app. However, all three of these methods for sending one-time tokens are phishable; even with the brokerage firm’s app, the phishers could prompt the user to approve a login request that they initiated in the app with the phished credentials.
Vanguard offers customers a range of multi-factor authentication choices, including the option to require a physical security key in addition to one’s credentials on each login. A security key implements a robust form of multi-factor authentication known as Universal 2nd Factor (U2F), which allows the user to complete the login process simply by connecting an enrolled USB or Bluetooth device and pressing a button. The key works without the need for any special software drivers, and the nice thing about it is your second factor cannot be phished.
Merrill said that in many ways the ramp-and-dump scheme is the perfect crime because it leaves precious few connections between the victim brokerage accounts and the fraudsters.
“It’s really genius because it decouples so many things,” he said. “They can buy shares [in the stock to be pumped] in their personal account on the Chinese exchanges, and the price happens to go up. The Chinese or Hong Kong brokerages aren’t going to see anything funky.”
Merrill said it’s unclear exactly how those perpetrating these ramp-and-dump schemes coordinate their activities, such as whether the accounts are phished well in advance or shortly before being used to inflate the stock price of Chinese companies. The latter possibility would fit nicely with the existing human infrastructure these criminal groups already have in place.
For example, KrebsOnSecurity recently wrote about research from Merrill and other researchers showing the phishers behind these slick mobile phishing kits employed people to sit for hours at a time in front of large banks of mobile phones being used to send the text message lures. These technicians were needed to respond in real time to victims who were supplying the one-time code sent from their financial institution.
The ashtray says: You’ve been phishing all night.
“You can get access to a victim’s brokerage with a one-time passcode, but then you sort of have to use it right away if you can’t set new security settings so you can come back to that account later,” Merrill said.
The rapid pace of innovations produced by these China-based phishing vendors is due in part to their use of artificial intelligence and large language models to help develop the mobile phishing kits, he added.
“These guys are vibe coding stuff together and using LLMs to translate things or help put the user interface together,” Merrill said. “It’s only a matter of time before they start to integrate the LLMs into their development cycle to make it more rapid. The technologies they are building definitely have helped lower the barrier of entry for everyone.”
Malicious software, also called malware, refers to any program or code engineered to harm or exploit computer systems, networks and devices. It affects your phone’s functionality, especially if you jailbreak your device—that is, opening your iOS to additional features, apps, and themes.
The risks associated with a malware infection can range from poor device performance to stolen data. Cybercriminals typically use it to extract data—from financial data and healthcare records to emails and passwords—that they can leverage over victims for financial gain.
Thanks to their closed ecosystem, built-in security features, and strict policies on third-party apps, Apple devices tend to be generally resilient against malware infections. It’s important to note, however, that they’re not completely without vulnerabilities.
Read on to learn how you can detect malware on your iPhone and how to remove these infections so you can get back to enjoying your digital activities.
While traditional self-replicating viruses are rare on iPhones, malware is a genuine threat for Apple devices. Malware typically enters through links in deceptive texts or emails or through downloaded, unvetted apps rather than system-wide infection. These are some types of malware that could infect your iPhone:
To keep you safe against malware and other threats, Apple engineers the iPhone with multiple security layers, including:
Together, these features create a highly secure environment for iPhones. However, this robust shield does not eliminate all risks, as threats can still bypass these defenses through phishing scams or by tricking a user into installing a malicious configuration profile.
If your iPhone is exhibiting these odd activities listed below, a manual scan is your first point of order. These quick actions are free to do as they are already integrated into your device.
The disadvantage of doing a manual scan is that it requires effort. In addition, it does not detect sophisticated malware, and only identifies symptoms rather than root causes.
If your iPhone persistently exhibits any of the red flags above despite your quick actions, you may have to investigate using a third-party security app to find the threats that manual checks don’t catch.
Compared with manual or built-in scans, third-party solutions like McAfee Mobile Security offer automated, comprehensive malware scans by detecting a wider range of threats before they enter your digital space. While available at a premium, third-party security suites offer great value as they include full-scale protection that includes a safe browsing feature to protect your digital life and a virtual private network (VPN) for a more secure internet connection.
If the scan confirms the presence of malware on your iPhone, don’t worry. There’s still time to protect yourself and your data. Below is an action plan you can follow to remove malware from your device.
In many cases, hackers exploit outdated versions of iOS to launch malware attacks. If you don’t have the latest version of your operating system, it’s a good idea to update your iOS immediately to close this potential vulnerability. To do this, go to Settings > General > Software Update and follow the instructions to update your iPhone.
It might sound simple, but restarting your device can fix certain issues. The system will restart on its own when updating the iOS. If you already have the latest version, restart your iPhone now.
If updating the iOS and restarting your device didn’t fix the issue, try clearing your phone’s browsing history and data. If you’re using Safari, go to Settings > Clear History and Website Data > Clear History and Data. Keep in mind that the process is similar for Google Chrome and most other popular web browsers.
Malicious software, such as spyware and ransomware, often end up on phones by masquerading as legitimate apps. To err on the side of caution, delete any apps that you don’t remember downloading or installing.
The option to restore to a previous backup is one of the most valuable features found on the iPhone and iPad. This allows you to restore your device to an iCloud backup version that was made before the malware infection. Go to Settings > General > Transfer or Reset iPhone > Erase All Content and Settings > Restore from iCloud Backup.
A factory reset should be your last resort when other removal methods have failed, as it is a complete data wipe. That means it will erase all content and settings, including any malicious apps, profiles, or files, returning the software to its original, out-of-the-box state. That’s why it’s crucial to back up your essential data such as photos and contacts first. Also, remember to restore to an iCloud backup version *before* the malware infection to avoid reintroducing the infection. For the highest level of security, set the iPhone up as new and manually redownload trusted apps from the App Store. When you are ready to reset, go to Settings > General > Transfer or Reset iPhone > Erase All Content and Settings > Set Up as New iPhone.
Spyware is designed to be sneaky, but it leaves subtle traces. Pay attention to your iPhone’s behavior, such as the camera or microphone unexpectedly activating as indicated by a green or orange dot in the status bar, sudden battery drain, or your device overheating for no reason. Another major red flag is a spike in data usage when you aren’t actively using your phone.
For a deeper look, do this 5-minute check to see which apps have accessed your data, camera, and microphone. Look for any activity that seems suspicious or that you don’t recall authorizing.
If you suspect your iPhone has been compromised, it’s important to act quickly. Here’s a step-by-step process to remove it, restore your privacy, and prevent future threats.
A common tactic used by scammers is the fake virus pop-up. These alarming messages appear while you are browsing, often using logos from Apple or other trusted companies, and claim your iPhone is infected. Their goal is to create panic, urging you to click a link, download a fake app, or call a fraudulent support number. Never interact with these pop-ups. Here’s a quick response plan when dealing with fake virus pop-up ads:
Never enter personal information, passwords, or payment details on a page that appears from a pop-up ad.
The best way to protect your iOS device is to avoid malware in the first place. Follow these security measures to safeguard your device:
Can my iPhone get a virus from opening an email?
Simply opening an email is very unlikely to infect your iPhone. However, clicking a malicious link or downloading an attachment from a phishing email can lead you to a harmful website or trick you into compromising your information. It’s the action you take, not opening the email itself, that creates the risk.
How do I know if a virus warning is real or fake?
Any pop-up in your browser that claims your iPhone has a virus is fake. Apple does not send notifications like this. These are scare tactics designed to trick you into clicking a link or calling a fake support number. The safest response is to close the browser tab and clear your browsing data.
Does my iPhone really need antivirus software?
It’s a misconception that iPhones are immune to all viruses. While Apple’s built-in security provides a strong defense, it doesn’t offer complete protection. Cybercriminals are increasingly using phishing, smishing, AI voice cloning, deepfake videos and other social engineering methods to target iPhone users. A comprehensive security app provides layered protection beyond the iOS integrated security. Think of it as adding a professional security guard to already-strong walls.
What is the best way to check my iPhone for a virus or malware for free?
You can perform manual checks for free by looking for suspicious apps, checking for unusual battery drain and data usage, and reviewing your App Privacy Report. While helpful for spotting obvious issues, these manual checks aren’t foolproof. A dedicated security app offers a more reliable and thorough analysis.
Can an iPhone get malware without jailbreaking it?
Yes. While jailbreaking significantly increases the risk, malware can still infect a non-jailbroken iPhone. This typically happens through sophisticated phishing attacks, installing malicious configuration profiles from untrusted sources, or, in very rare cases, by exploiting an unknown vulnerability in iOS, known as a “zero-day” attack.
Is an iPhone malware scan truly necessary?
Given the value of the personal data on our phones, a regular malware scan provides significant peace of mind. A reputable security app can identify vulnerabilities you might miss, such as outdated software or risky system settings, helping you maintain a strong security posture.
Keeping your iPhone secure from malware is an achievable goal that puts you in control of your digital safety. By combining smart habits with powerful security tools, you can confidently protect your personal information from emerging threats.
McAfee is committed to empowering you with the resources and protection needed to navigate the online world safely. McAfee Mobile Security provides full protection against various types of malware targeting the Apple ecosystem. With safe browsing features, a secure VPN, and antivirus software, McAfee Security for iOS delivers protection against emerging threats, so you can continue to use your iPhone with peace of mind. Download the McAfee Mobile Security app today and get all-in-one protection.
The post A Guide to Remove Malware From Your iPhone appeared first on McAfee Blog.
Scammers didn’t take a summer break. They kept busy, ramping up a fresh wave of back-to-school shopping scams. As busy families rush to get kitted out for a new school year, scammers are ready with a glut of phony shopping sites, bogus offers, and fake delivery notifications designed to steal your money and personal info. Let’s get a rundown of what scams are out there this year and how you can avoid them.
Scammers look to cash in on all the spending that tends to peak in July and August. According to the National Retail Federation, the average U.S. family spends nearly $860 per child to prep them for school—which includes supplies, clothing, and shoes for the new school year. So, like any time of year where a holiday or seasonal event drives a spike in online shopping, we see a rise in scam shopping sites.
The scammers behind these sites promote them in several ways, such as through sponsored search links, email offers, and through social media ads (more on that in a moment). Typically, these sites fall into two categories:
While scammers use the lure of low-priced classroom staples like pens, notebooks, backpacks, and the like, they also crank out non-existent deals everything from clothing and shoes to big-ticket items like laptop computers. Also popular are phony shopping sprees and giveaways, which also lure shoppers into handing over their account and personal info. In all, with online shopping hitting another seasonal peak, it’s time for shoppers to give those ads and deals a particularly closer look. Scammers are out there in force.
Fake social media ads remain a mainstay of the scammer arsenal, and scammers most certainly put them to use during back-to-school time. Scammers love social media ads because they offer precise audience targeting. With a convincing-looking ad created using AI tools, they can reach vast numbers of interested buyers—people who are on the lookout for back-to-school deals. With these ads, they point potential victims to the sites mentioned above, all with the hope that unsuspecting shoppers will impulsively click on the deal. From there, the scam works much the same as above. Shoppers end up on a scam site that often looks convincing (thanks again to AI tools that help scammers spin them up quickly) where they enter their personal and account info, only to end up getting scammed.
Another popular scammer ploy involves shipping notifications. Scammers know that with lots of online shopping comes a lot of online shipping notifications. They send phony delivery messages by the thousands, all with the aim of catching a few victims who have real packages on the way.
They pose as legitimate shippers and retailers, do their best to look and sound like them, and use urgency to get people to act. “Your package can’t be delivered. Please click this link within the next 24 hours to get your shipment.” And so on. In some cases, those links lead to phishing and malware sites. In others, the notification contains an attachment that installs malware if clicked.
With these scams in the mix, here’s how you can stay safe:
The post Scammers Take Advantage of Back-to-School Shopping Scams. appeared first on McAfee Blog.
You can request data brokers to remove your personal info from their databases. But finding their request forms is another challenge entirely, especially when they’re hidden. Recent reporting from CalMatters and The Markup found that 35 data brokers injected code into their websites that hid their opt out pages from search, making it more difficult for people to delete their data.If you don’t like the idea of your sensitive personal info being collected, bought, and sold without your knowledge, this is important news for you.
And these brokers collect plenty of it. They compile often exacting profiles of people, which can include things like purchasing habits, health data, financial info, real-time location data (gathered from smartphone apps), and even inferred info like political leanings, lifestyle choices, and religious beliefs.
As you can see, this level of data collection can get entirely personal.
Moreover, practically anyone can purchase this sensitive info. That ranges from advertisers to law enforcement and from employers to anyone on the street who wants to know a lot more about you.
This report stands as a good reminder that data collection on this level is an everyday fact of life—and that you can still take some control of it.
With a quick look at the report, we’ll then show you what’s going on with all this data collection and what you can do about it.
As part of the article, reporters analyzed 499 data broker sites registered in the state of California. Of them, 35 had search-blocking code. Additionally per the article, many opt out pages “required scrolling multiple screens, dismissing pop-ups for cookie permissions, and newsletter sign-ups and then finding a link that was a fraction the size of other text on the page.” Once the publications contacted the data brokers in question, multiple companies halted the practice, some responding that they were unaware their site had search-blocking code. Several others didn’t respond by the time the article was published and kept their practices in place.
There are several ways information brokers can get information about you…
Sources available to the public: Some of your personal records are easily available to the public. Data brokers can collect public records like your voter registration records, birth certificate, criminal record, and even bankruptcy records. By rounding them up from multiple sources and gathering them in one place, it takes someone seconds to find out all these things about you, rather than spending hours poring over public records.
Search, browsing, and app usage: Through a combination of data collected from internet service providers (ISPs), websites, and apps, data brokers can get access to all kinds of activity. They can see what content you’re interested in, how much time you spend on certain sites, and even your daily travels thanks to location data. They also use web scraping tools (software that pulls info from the web), to gather yet more. All this data collecting makes up a multi-billion-dollar industry where personal data is gathered, analyzed, sold, and then sold again and again—all without a person’s knowledge.
Online agreements: As it is with smartphone apps, you’ll usually have to sign an agreement when signing up for a new online service. Many of these agreements have disclosures in the fine print that give the company the right to collect and distribute your personal info.
Purchase history: Data brokers want to know what products or services you’ve purchased, how you paid for them (credit card, debit card, or coupon), and when and where you purchased them. In some cases, they get this info from loyalty programs at places like supermarkets, drugstores, and other retailers. Kroger, one of the largest grocery chains, is a good example of how purchasing insights end up in the hands of others. According to Consumer Reports, the company draws 35% of its net income from selling customer data to other companies.
“What can I do about companies collecting my data?”
For starters, there aren’t any data privacy laws on the federal level. So far, that has fallen to individual states to enact. As such, data privacy laws vary from state-to-state, with California having some of the earliest and strongest protections on record, via the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) and the California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA).
In all, 20 states currently have comprehensive privacy laws in place, with five others that have put narrower privacy protections in place, covering data brokers, internet service providers, and medical/biometric data.
States with Comprehensive Data Privacy Laws
For specific laws in your state and how they can protect you, we suggest doing a search for “data privacy laws [your state]” for more info.
Even if your state has no or narrow data privacy laws in place, you still have several ways you can take back your privacy.
The first thing you can do is keep a lower profile online. That can limit the amount of personal info they can get their hands on:
Be selective about what you share online. Don’t overshare personal info on social media. Avoid things like online quizzes and sweepstakes. And be aware that some data brokers indeed scour the web with scraping tools that gather up info from things like forum posts.
Go private. Even better, lock down your privacy on social media. Social media platforms like Facebook, Instagram, and others have several settings that keep your profile from being scraped in the ways mentioned above. Features like our Social Privacy Manager can make quick work of this by adjusting more than 100 privacy settings across your accounts in a few clicks.
Use a virtual private network (VPN) whenever possible. A VPN hides your IP address and encrypts your data while you surf the web. McAfee’s Secure VPN protects your personal data and credit card information so you can browse, bank, and shop online without worrying about prying eyes, like data brokers and internet service providers (ISPs) that collect info about what you do online.
The list of data brokers is long. Cleaning up your personal data online can quickly eat up your time, as it requires you to reach out to multiple data brokers and opt out. Rather than removing yourself one by one from the host of data broker sites out there, you have a solution: our Personal Data Cleanup.
Personal Data Cleanup scans data broker sites and shows you which ones are selling your personal info. It also provides guidance on how you can remove your data from those sites. And if you want to save time on manually removing that info, you have options. Our McAfee+ Advanced and Ultimate plans come with full-service Personal Data Cleanup, which sends requests to remove your data automatically. If the thought of your personal info getting bought and sold in such a public way bothers you, our Personal Data Cleanup can put you back in charge of it.
The post You Have a Right to Delete Your Data—But Dozens of Data Brokers Hide How to Do It appeared first on McAfee Blog.
Scammers are exploiting the massive popularity of Labubu collectible toys through fake websites and social media ads, resulting in consumers losing hundreds of dollars to counterfeit “Lafufu” dolls or receiving nothing at all. Here’s how to protect yourself from becoming their next victim.
If you haven’t heard of Labubu dolls yet, you’re about to understand why they’ve become both a cultural obsession and a cybersecurity nightmare. These small, mischievous-looking plush toys with distinctive sharp teeth have exploded in popularity thanks to celebrity endorsements from Rihanna, Dua Lipa, and BLACKPINK’s Lisa, plus viral TikTok unboxing videos.
Created by Hong Kong artist Kasing Lung and sold exclusively by Pop Mart since 2019, these $20-$30 “blind box” collectibles have generated such intense demand that rare “secret” versions are reselling for thousands of dollars. Fans line up for hours at Pop Mart stores and even travel internationally to get their hands on authentic Labubus. Where there’s viral demand and limited supply, cybercriminals inevitably follow.
The Better Business Bureau has received over 76 reports from consumers who thought they were purchasing authentic Labubu dolls but instead received counterfeit versions dubbed “Lafufus” – or worse, nothing at all. Some victims report losses of nearly $500 from a single fraudulent transaction.
The attack vector is disturbingly familiar yet devastatingly effective:
1. Social Media Infiltration: Scammers flood TikTok and Instagram with sponsored ads featuring “limited edition” Labubu dolls at discounted prices
2. Fake Website Creation: Professional-looking e-commerce sites mimic Pop Mart’s official branding and use urgent language like “limited stock” and countdown timers
3. Payment Harvesting: Once victims enter payment information, scammers either ship low-quality counterfeits or disappear entirely
4. Digital Vanishing Act: When complaints mount, the entire operation disappears overnight, only to resurface under a new domain name
The BBB has specifically flagged these scam operations:
Additionally, TikTok live streams claiming to be “Pop Mart USA” have been particularly problematic, using high-pressure sales tactics and fake countdown timers to rush buyers into immediate purchases.
These fraudulent advertisements are designed to look legitimate and often feature professional product photography stolen from Pop Mart’s official channels. The ads frequently claim unrealistic discounts such as “50% off limited edition Labubu” or similar offers that seem too good to be true. Promotional copy emphasizes false urgency with phrases like “Last 24 hours!” or “Only 100 left!” to pressure consumers into making immediate purchases without proper consideration.
Warning signs include links that redirect to domains other than popmart.com or Pop Mart’s official Amazon store, indicating fraudulent operations. These ads typically originate from accounts with generic names or recently created profiles that have little post history, suggesting they were established specifically for scamming purposes. The comments sections are either disabled entirely or filled with obviously fake positive reviews designed to create an illusion of satisfied customers.
Scammers often use unofficial terminology or deliberate misspellings of “Labubu,” sometimes intentionally using variations like “Lafufu” to avoid detection by platform algorithms designed to identify and remove fraudulent content related to official brand names.
TikTok live streams have become a particularly dangerous vector for Labubu scams, operating as sophisticated psychological manipulation campaigns. These streams claim to be “Pop Mart USA” and run for up to 12 hours daily, using countdown timers that reset repeatedly to create false urgency. The hosts make claims of “restocks” or “newly available inventory” that never actually existed, giving viewers only seconds to purchase once items “drop” to prevent careful consideration.
The manipulation extends to chat features filled with fake comments from bot accounts expressing excitement, while QR codes displayed on stream appear authentic but lead to fraudulent websites. Many hosts wear Pop Mart merchandise or display authentic products while selling counterfeits, using stream titles with official-sounding language like “Official Pop Mart Restock Event” to enhance their credibility.
Scammers create networks of interconnected fake accounts to build credibility and reach wider audiences. These profiles use variations of names like “Pop Mart USA” or “Official Labubu Store,” copying official Pop Mart language and contact information in their bio sections. They use profile pictures featuring Pop Mart’s logo or official product photography without permission, engaging in cross-promotion between fake accounts to create an illusion of legitimacy.
These fraudulent accounts maintain artificially inflated follower counts through bot networks and post histories that are either very recent or filled with stolen content from official accounts. The posting patterns appear inconsistent, suggesting automated or outsourced management, while comments and engagement seem coordinated rather than organic.
Visual “proof” elements appear legitimate but are actually fabricated to deceive consumers. QR codes redirect to fake verification websites rather than Pop Mart’s official system, while authenticity certificates or stamps use similar but not identical branding to official materials. Scammers use photos of authentic Labubu products to “prove” legitimacy while shipping counterfeits, providing serial numbers or batch codes that don’t match Pop Mart’s actual numbering systems.
The deception includes holographic stickers or security features that look similar but lack proper verification methods, screenshots of “authentication apps” that are actually fake applications created by scammers, and references to verification through third-party services that don’t actually authenticate Pop Mart products. Authentic packaging may be displayed while the actual shipped products come in generic or counterfeit boxes.
Several warning signs indicate fraudulent operations. Scammers often request payment through peer-to-peer apps like CashApp or Venmo, avoid implementing secure checkout processes or SSL certificates, and make it impossible to cancel orders immediately after placement. Customer service typically becomes unresponsive after payment is received, leaving consumers with no recourse.
Genuine Labubu toys have exactly nine pointed teeth, which serves as the key identifier for authenticity. They feature a pale peach complexion with specific color consistency and display the official Pop Mart logo stamped on the bottom of one foot. Authentic products come in proper packaging with legitimate QR codes and holographic stickers, including authenticity stamps that can be verified through Pop Mart’s official system.
Counterfeit versions exhibit several telltale signs of fraudulent manufacturing. These fake toys have more or fewer than nine teeth, different facial colors or expressions, and missing or fake Pop Mart branding. The materials and construction quality are noticeably poor, and packaging lacks verifiable QR codes that connect to official authentication systems.
Protecting yourself from these scams requires a multi-layered approach starting with shopping exclusively through official channels. Purchase only from Pop Mart’s official website at popmart.com or their verified Amazon store to ensure authenticity. Before making purchases from unfamiliar retailers, always search for “[website name] + scam” to verify their legitimacy.
Use secure payment methods that offer fraud protection and dispute capabilities, particularly credit cards rather than peer-to-peer payment apps. Maintain extreme skepticism toward social media ads, especially those creating artificial urgency or pressure to purchase immediately.
If you discover you’ve been scammed, document everything immediately by saving screenshots, emails, and transaction records. Contact your credit card company or bank without delay to dispute charges and report the scam to the Better Business Bureau’s Scam Tracker. File complaints with the Federal Trade Commission to help authorities track these criminal operations.
Request chargebacks through your credit card provider and provide all documentation showing misrepresentation of goods. Avoid using peer-to-peer payment apps for future purchases as they offer limited fraud protection and fewer options for recovery when scams occur.
The Labubu scam represents a troubling evolution in cybercriminal tactics, demonstrating how quickly bad actors can weaponize viral trends to create sophisticated fraud networks. These operations exploit consumer psychology around FOMO (fear of missing out) and artificial scarcity to pressure victims into making hasty financial decisions.
Several factors make this particularly dangerous for consumers and cybersecurity professionals alike. The speed of adaptation allows scammers to create convincing fake operations within days of a trend emerging, while social media amplification means platforms struggle to quickly identify and remove fraudulent sponsored content. The international scope of many operations makes law enforcement cooperation challenging, and the target demographics often include Gen Z consumers who may be early adopters of trends but lack experience with sophisticated scams.
Pop Mart has been working to combat counterfeiting, but the distributed nature of online fraud makes this an ongoing challenge. Social media platforms are slowly improving their ad verification processes, though scammers continue finding workarounds to exploit system vulnerabilities.
International customs officials have begun seizing shipments of counterfeit Labubu toys, with hundreds of thousands of fake units confiscated in recent operations. However, the profit margins on these scams remain attractive enough that new operations continue launching regularly, adapting their tactics to avoid detection.
As cybersecurity professionals and informed consumers, we have a responsibility to educate others about these evolving threats. The Labubu scam won’t be the last time cybercriminals exploit viral cultural phenomena – it represents the most recent example of an increasingly sophisticated playbook that targets consumer psychology and cultural trends.
Consumer protection requires constant vigilance and education. Always verify the authenticity of sellers before providing payment information, maintain suspicion of deals that seem too good to be true, and use payment methods that offer fraud protection and dispute capabilities. Report suspected scams to relevant authorities to help protect other consumers from similar harm.
The intersection of viral culture and cybercrime is only going to become more complex as digital trends accelerate and criminal operations become more sophisticated. By staying informed about these tactics and sharing knowledge with our communities, we can help reduce the success rate of these operations and protect consumers from financial harm.
Remember that when it comes to viral trends and online shopping, a healthy dose of skepticism isn’t cynicism – it’s cybersecurity best practice. The cost of verification is always less than the cost of victimization.
The post Going Lacoocoo over Labubu: How Viral Toy Trends Are Becoming Scams appeared first on McAfee Blog.
Microsoft today released updates to fix more than 100 security flaws in its Windows operating systems and other software. At least 13 of the bugs received Microsoft’s most-dire “critical” rating, meaning they could be abused by malware or malcontents to gain remote access to a Windows system with little or no help from users.
August’s patch batch from Redmond includes an update for CVE-2025-53786, a vulnerability that allows an attacker to pivot from a compromised Microsoft Exchange Server directly into an organization’s cloud environment, potentially gaining control over Exchange Online and other connected Microsoft Office 365 services. Microsoft first warned about this bug on Aug. 6, saying it affects Exchange Server 2016 and Exchange Server 2019, as well as its flagship Exchange Server Subscription Edition.
Ben McCarthy, lead cyber security engineer at Immersive, said a rough search reveals approximately 29,000 Exchange servers publicly facing on the internet that are vulnerable to this issue, with many of them likely to have even older vulnerabilities.
McCarthy said the fix for CVE-2025-53786 requires more than just installing a patch, such as following Microsoft’s manual instructions for creating a dedicated service to oversee and lock down the hybrid connection.
“In effect, this vulnerability turns a significant on-premise Exchange breach into a full-blown, difficult-to-detect cloud compromise with effectively living off the land techniques which are always harder to detect for defensive teams,” McCarthy said.
CVE-2025-53779 is a weakness in the Windows Kerberos authentication system that allows an unauthenticated attacker to gain domain administrator privileges. Microsoft credits the discovery of the flaw to Akamai researcher Yuval Gordon, who dubbed it “BadSuccessor” in a May 2025 blog post. The attack exploits a weakness in “delegated Managed Service Account” or dMSA — a feature that was introduced in Windows Server 2025.
Some of the critical flaws addressed this month with the highest severity (between 9.0 and 9.9 CVSS scores) include a remote code execution bug in the Windows GDI+ component that handles graphics rendering (CVE-2025-53766) and CVE-2025-50165, another graphics rendering weakness. Another critical patch involves CVE-2025-53733, a vulnerability in Microsoft Word that can be exploited without user interaction and triggered through the Preview Pane.
One final critical bug tackled this month deserves attention: CVE-2025-53778, a bug in Windows NTLM, a core function of how Windows systems handle network authentication. According to Microsoft, the flaw could allow an attacker with low-level network access and basic user privileges to exploit NTLM and elevate to SYSTEM-level access — the highest level of privilege in Windows. Microsoft rates the exploitation of this bug as “more likely,” although there is no evidence the vulnerability is being exploited at the moment.
Feel free to holler in the comments if you experience problems installing any of these updates. As ever, the SANS Internet Storm Center has its useful breakdown of the Microsoft patches indexed by severity and CVSS score, and AskWoody.com is keeping an eye out for Windows patches that may cause problems for enterprises and end users.
Windows 10 users out there likely have noticed by now that Microsoft really wants you to upgrade to Windows 11. The reason is that after the Patch Tuesday on October 14, 2025, Microsoft will stop shipping free security updates for Windows 10 computers. The trouble is, many PCs running Windows 10 do not meet the hardware specifications required to install Windows 11 (or they do, but just barely).
If the experience with Windows XP is any indicator, many of these older computers will wind up in landfills or else will be left running in an unpatched state. But if your Windows 10 PC doesn’t have the hardware chops to run Windows 11 and you’d still like to get some use out of it safely, consider installing a newbie-friendly version of Linux, like Linux Mint.
Like most modern Linux versions, Mint will run on anything with a 64-bit CPU that has at least 2GB of memory, although 4GB is recommended. In other words, it will run on almost any computer produced in the last decade.
There are many versions of Linux available, but Linux Mint is likely to be the most intuitive interface for regular Windows users, and it is largely configurable without any fuss at the text-only command-line prompt. Mint and other flavors of Linux come with LibreOffice, which is an open source suite of tools that includes applications similar to Microsoft Office, and it can open, edit and save documents as Microsoft Office files.
If you’d prefer to give Linux a test drive before installing it on a Windows PC, you can always just download it to a removable USB drive. From there, reboot the computer (with the removable drive plugged in) and select the option at startup to run the operating system from the external USB drive. If you don’t see an option for that after restarting, try restarting again and hitting the F8 button, which should open a list of bootable drives. Here’s a fairly thorough tutorial that walks through exactly how to do all this.
And if this is your first time trying out Linux, relax and have fun: The nice thing about a “live” version of Linux (as it’s called when the operating system is run from a removable drive such as a CD or a USB stick) is that none of your changes persist after a reboot. Even if you somehow manage to break something, a restart will return the system back to its original state.
Article tags
